Rachel should cut this Robinson guy off. Just cut him off. It is her show and he is creating

[ncteechur]

an impromptu campaign ad. CUT HIM OFF!!!!

[mwb970]

1. Wow, this is pretty bad.

What a rude jerk. Why did he come on?

[tridim]

2. Complete waste of time

Insane assholes deserve no air time.

[GodlessBiker]

3. It's a mistake to have those kind of people on her show. Any publicity for them...

is a win for them.

[Bluenorthwest]

17. In my line of work, we say

The only people who think all publicity is good publicity are people who have never had any publicity at all. In short, I wildly disagree that this was any form of 'win' for Robinson, who is a candidate in my district. This was a great service to the voters here, Robinson has ducked out of debates and this gives Oregon's 4th a clear picture of the sort of man the Republican Party has chosen as their very best and brightest.

[Chipper Chat]

4. Oh, let him go on!

This will show for posterity what a fucking ignorant nasty jerk this man is. Watch for it on YouTube soon.

[AllieB]

5. No shit. I have him on mute.

:wtf:

He thinks he's on RW radio or something...

[C_U_L8R]

6. what a jerk

wow

[impik]

7. Cut him off already. What an asshole

[Clio the Leo]

8. Yep .... love her ..... but make it stop ........

..... isn't there some metaphor about trying to win an argument with a fool or something?

[Flash Bazbo]

9. Republicans will make this guy a hero for being an asshole.

[sandnsea]

10. The one running against DeFazio?

I told you I'd need a bag over my head if he wins.

[bigdarryl]

11. Why do these progressive talk show host think it's nessasary to put rethugs on there show

hate to say it but this guy almost took over her show

[MadMaddie]

16. In this case "Exposure"

The more exposure of these Repugs pushes the moderates more to the left. It is easy to see that there are some mental issues on that side.

[JoePhilly]

12. That guy was nuts.

[Sky Masterson]

13. No she shouldn't cut him off.

That is something Fox news does.
Rachel just proved that she was better than that.

[Kind of Blue]

14. Agree.

I was hoping she wouldn't cut him off. It's great to see them unravel by blaming others for their indefensible positions.
He needs to be seen for what he is - arrogant, bombastic and totally inflexible. Good for Rachel.

[mulsh]

15. The focus quickly shifted from annonmous funding of commercials

to this guy's opinions and never once did the guy address the issues or answer any questions aside from admitting he doesn't have a problem with anonymously funded campaign commercials. It was brilliant and painful. Rachel handled it elegantly.

the candidate may end up as a teabagger hero. He certainly give me thumbnail portrait of teabaggerism at its best