|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
|
| wndycty
|
Sun Dec-05-10 11:14 AM Original message |
| The White House has been trying to BREAKUP the US Chamber of Commerce |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jaxx
|
Sun Dec-05-10 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. Kneecap them. Excellent. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| gateley
|
Sun Dec-05-10 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. There's a lot that goes on that we're not privy to, or it slips under the radar, so |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wndycty
|
Sun Dec-05-10 11:31 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. After serving in a senior capacity in the executive branch of state government I learned. . . |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tippy
|
Sun Dec-05-10 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. K&R.....The US Chamber is not our friend |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SidDithers
|
Sun Dec-05-10 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. He's an anti-corporatist corporatist!...nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| otohara
|
Sun Dec-05-10 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. US Chamber of Outsourcing |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Arctic Dave
|
Sun Dec-05-10 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
| 7. Sounds like trying to talk militant rascist out of the KKK. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mazzarro
|
Sun Dec-05-10 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. I am doubtful of this article. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Sun Dec-05-10 12:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. Deleted message |
| Name removed
|
Sun Dec-05-10 01:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 11. Deleted message |
| wndycty
|
Sun Dec-05-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. If Obama doesn't have the votes in the Senate its not caving. . . |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bhikkhu
|
Sun Dec-05-10 02:24 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 14. Nothing has been done yet, but... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sweetapogee
|
Mon Dec-06-10 12:12 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 22. if congress |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flamingdem
|
Sun Dec-05-10 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. Thanks for this info, very interesting nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| niceypoo
|
Sun Dec-05-10 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. Because they are funding republican elections |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| grumgrum
|
Sun Dec-05-10 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. Asking politely to quit is STUPID -- As dumb as the Admin reading letters to the Insurers so they |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| brentspeak
|
Sun Dec-05-10 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. So then Obama hands the Chamber a gift in the form of the NAFTA-style S. Korean free trade deal |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Laelth
|
Sun Dec-05-10 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. Break up the Chamber? Good idea. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mistertrickster
|
Sun Dec-05-10 07:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. "why in the hell would the White House be attempting to break up the US Chamber of Commerce" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Better Believe It
|
Sun Dec-05-10 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. That's why the White House got the Chamber's endorsment for his NAFTA like Korea trade deal. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Laelth
|
Mon Dec-06-10 09:40 AM Response to Reply #19 |
| 20. +1 (for the truth). |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Doremus
|
Mon Dec-06-10 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
| 21. How'd that fight with the CofC work out..? As well as everything else, looks like. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Feb 23rd 2026, 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC