gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 01:51 PM
Original message |
| Andrea Mitchell: "This shows that they've reached a new low when they're putting |
|
political tricks above national security" about Jim DeMint threatening to demand a full reading of the New STAERT Treaty. Good for you, Andrea! :headbang:
|
JoePhilly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. About time, Andrea usually carries a huge right wing water bucket. |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Every once in a while I'm surprised by her objectivity. I applaud her for speaking |
BonnieJW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 7. But this isn't objective. |
|
She's giving her personal opinion. She's supposed to be a reporter, not a commentator. If you comment, you're Keith Olbermann or Fox n Friends.
|
thereismore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 13. Yes, but I still like what she said. nt |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 15. Yeah, good point, but I guess I meant she wasn't looking at through Republican |
|
eyes, as I get the sense she often does.
|
Supersedeas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. finally....months and months and months after the fact...as if she is telling us something new |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. She had a guest on and that was the discussion -- not sure how long ago DeMint |
|
made the threat, but this was the time for her to say that. And she may have expressed that view before, I don't know. I'm giving her the props she deserves for saying this and putting it this way (I think she said more but I didn't catch it) - she didn't have to voice that opinion at all, but she did.
|
monmouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 10. Maybe a note to her @ MSNBC would re-enforce her to continue |
|
to not be afraid to put the truth out there. Good for you Andrea!
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 14. Good idea! I always try to do that but don't always remember. Thanks! nt |
GodlessBiker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 01:58 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. The story about how even a blind squirrel gets a nut now and then comes to mind. |
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
|
Lilyeye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. About damn time Andrea. Where have you been the last 2 years? |
Supersedeas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-16-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 20. she and the other Beltway media wonk has been cheering every procedural victory |
|
where the minority Republicans have successfully blocked populous legislation.
To them, politics is a superficial game.
|
flamingdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. She was quoting the White House nt |
katty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Andrea? usually your dress color is red and now this from you?! |
|
amazing, chugging too much beltway egg nog? my, what backbone!
|
glinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. Espionage! Treason! Terrorist! |
Major Hogwash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
| 16. This is a treaty, not a bill. Maybe Demint should go read the Senate rulez again. |
|
Or maybe he could go to Michelle Bachmann's Politicial Science class seminars she is putting on next year.
Ratifying a treaty doesn't require a full reading on the floor.
|
donheld
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 17. Thank you Mrs. Greenspan |
catgirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message |
| 18. Wow, coming from her I'm shocked |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 10:48 PM by catgirl
This is a good sign. Maybe some repugs are starting to see the light?
|
COLGATE4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 11:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 19. Wow - Mrs. Greenspan actually got one right. Well, as they say |
newtothegame
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-16-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
| 21. Why are we enabling these douschebags by making 1000-page-bills? |
Arkana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-16-10 07:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 22. The last five Republican SoSes, as well as goddamn KISSINGER, support |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 19th 2026, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message |