|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
|
| jefferson_dem
|
Sat Dec-18-10 12:33 PM Original message |
| Scott Brown on his vote to advance DADT repeal: "It's just another vote." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clio the Leo
|
Sat Dec-18-10 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. whatever his reason, I'll take it. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jennicut
|
Sat Dec-18-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. It is simple. He is a Senator from Mass. Some want a reason for Lieberman's |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Arkana
|
Sat Dec-18-10 03:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Lieberman has a history of being good on domestic issues and |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TheKentuckian
|
Sat Dec-18-10 04:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. Lieberman is good on civil rights but garbage on empire, civil liberties, and economic justice |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jennicut
|
Sat Dec-18-10 05:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. Lieberman is also toast in my state. I can't see him winning in CT again. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TheKentuckian
|
Sat Dec-18-10 10:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 11. I figured as much but I'd love to boot his ass from the caucus |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jennicut
|
Sat Dec-18-10 05:38 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 9. True. To stay a Senator in Mass, he had to vote this way. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BeyondGeography
|
Sun Dec-19-10 07:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 12. Lieberman was a big reason why HCR didn't go much further |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dsc
|
Sun Dec-19-10 10:14 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 13. Lieberman has a close to 40 year career of being good on gay issues |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| karynnj
|
Sat Dec-18-10 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. His staffers seem to really control him - it seems rare that there is ever a |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| great white snark
|
Sat Dec-18-10 05:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 7. I'm glad someone else noticed that too. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Arkana
|
Sat Dec-18-10 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. Coward. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lilyeye
|
Sat Dec-18-10 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. Shitty response considering how big this was, but whatever. At least the prick voted lol. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JoePhilly
|
Sun Dec-19-10 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
| 14. Shush ... listen ... can you hear the pop pop pop of Tea Bagger heads? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Feb 15th 2026, 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC