www.nytimes.com/2010/12/25/us/25hawaii.html
HONOLULU — Gov. Neil Abercrombie of Hawaii, who befriended President Obama’s parents when they were university students here, has been in office for less than three weeks. But he is so incensed over "birthers" — the conspiracy theorists who assert that Mr. Obama was born in Kenya and was thus not eligible to become president — that he is seeking ways to change state policy to allow him to release additional proof that the president was born in Honolulu in 1961.
"It’s an insult to his mother and to his father, and I knew his mother and father; they were my friends, and I have an emotional interest in that," Governor Abercrombie said in a telephone interview late Thursday. "It’s an emotional insult. It is disrespectful to the president; it is disrespectful to the office."
Whoa! I didn't know that Abercrombie was a personal friend of Obama's parents!
But as for releasing more data, aren't the certificate of live birth and newspaper announcements ENOUGH proof that Barack Hussein Obama II was truly born in Honolulu? It just makes no damn sense that he'd be born in frickin' Kenya or else where given that his parents had been married 6 months before. While we know which hospital Mrs. Dunham went to give birth to Barack, the birthers have yet to provide any satisfactory proof that Mrs. Dunham was in Kenya, Canada, Mexico, anywhere else that August 4, 1961! Since Inauguration Day 2009 the issue's been
beaten to death over and over again. And those fools even went as far as to forge a Kenyan birth certificate (so ironic for complaining about forgery themselves!)
Besides, it's been Republicans (e.g. US Rep. Bill Posey, R-FL and some Republican state legislators) who've intro'd legislation to make Hawaii release the longform certificate or generally to make future presidential candidates do so. Is Abercrombie falling for that trick?