|
However you also have to give all the people in prisons across the states a second chance.
It is not a caring attempt to give someone a second chance, if it is only some friend in your group. That is two tiered justice.
The concept of 'second chance' and mercy is maligned and disrespected when given to some and not others for reasons other then compassion justice and mercy.
And I am thankful for mercy and grace also, and also that I can think that way about people some things try to get me to hate, but I not about to think it applies to some group more then some other. That is a claim that has nothing to do with mercy or compassion but about the self, although I understand how it is done.
It is the comment of the death penalty. If someone were to hurt your family would you then promote the death penalty, by going after the person doing it?
In the same way what if your family member was looking at a death sentence, would you help them more then a stranger?
In the first case you would hope someone would help you not be vengeful and that through justice it could be taken care of with proper compassion, the attachment close to you that they hurt would make it hard for you to do proper justice.
In the second example, you should hope someone prosecutes great wrong that you can not prosecute by your caring for that individual as a fellow family member.
And if all people are your brothers and sisters, then vengeance belongs to the Lord.
Although I also think it best for people to try to have a just and compassionate system as best they can, treating the poor and the rich, or connected with same justice, not targeted justice, and also thinking on mitigating effects with concept of education and mercy. To avoid vengeance also, since most readings of angry passages I have read are not about God being upset about people being less zealous to him, but about inequity of how the poor are treated.
Then again, they think life is all there is, so do not see any vengeance occur correctly, and then think that means their actions are correct. Maybe so, maybe not, but that is for a open transparent court to decide, which it has not done yet.
It is not that hard to understand.
|