|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Armstead
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:37 PM Original message |
I wish Dennis Kucinich wouldn't do these things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. It's Ironic.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Kucinich.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 07:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
53. CNN is tired of him "mouthing off" too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 07:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
55. Probably why he's making the most of it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. If that happens, Lord hear our prayers, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I read that he has.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
33. Kucinich is definitely more of a - than a +. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. Disappointed in him. The call for impeachment doesn't help us at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. To be fair, he didn't call for his impeachment or say he should be impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:07 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. That's right. Thank you. He didn't call for the president's impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:21 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. "An impeachable offense" in relation to the President's decision means what to you?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
31. "it could be..." You're completely and uttterly wrong! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 06:01 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. Appears to be. Anyway, he never called for his impeachment or say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 06:09 PM Response to Reply #15 |
44. so why'd he even bring it up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 06:14 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. He probably brought it up because he thinks it is a constitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. Kucinich is just being Kucinich. His specialty is waxing righteously indignant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Looks like he's started veering off into Ralph Nader territory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
30. Which is why he could never be President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:40 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. This is why he should be president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. So you want him to be more like Obama, keep quiet and don't make a stand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Not at all. If he opposes the Libya operation, he's perfectly justified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Well we wouldn't want to do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. I'm not suggesting anything of the kind. I am suggesting that a sane, rational |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:13 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. WPA also says WE have to be in danger. Not interfering in other countries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:21 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. I don't recall Kucinich complaining about the Bosnia/Kosovo operation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Deleted message |
Armstead
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 07:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
56. Didn't say that.....But there's a way and there's a way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 07:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
61. I think you've just illustrated how "making a stand" is in itself ineffective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 08:18 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. So, by not making a stand is being effective? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 10:58 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. Obama got elected POTUS and got some laws passed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
10. "Kooch screws the pooch" -- For a long time I couldn't get past this line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 07:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
57. "Screw the Pooch" ....from the movie (and book) The Right Stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
12. No, no, we should definitely impeach the first black President for doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 04:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. He didn't do anything like 6 or so White presidents did...he did it the right way. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. You're 100% right. I can't wait to hear what it is. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solomon
![]() |
Tue Mar-22-11 10:31 AM Response to Reply #18 |
76. "In about a week there will be a new outrage" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:27 PM Response to Reply #17 |
29. Yes, he did it the right way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771
![]() |
Tue Mar-22-11 06:42 AM Response to Reply #17 |
70. AMEN!!! Both points very cogent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich Feingold
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
19. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doc03
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
21. Whatever it takes to get on camera n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
23. I tend to agree about Kuch, Armstead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:22 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Did Clark also suggest that this might be an impeachable decision by the President? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:25 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I doubt it as he's not an attorney or a member of Congress, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:34 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. So why suggest Clark in regards to what Kucinich said.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:44 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. I suggested Clark for an understanding of what's going on in Libya. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 06:06 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Ah, thanks for clearing that up. Thanks a lot elleng! ^_^ n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #41 |
48. You're welcome, vaberella. Gotta keep people up w Wes' thoughts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReggieVeggie
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
34. calling him "Kooch" probably doesn't help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 07:54 PM Response to Reply #34 |
58. Just mentioning the "I" word is bad enough -- especially in this political climate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReggieVeggie
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 10:01 PM Response to Reply #58 |
64. I know you have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
35. I agree, I wish he wouldn't be consistent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
38. Candidate Obama once said: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 05:51 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Do you know the definition of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 06:18 PM Response to Reply #39 |
49. Please see #45 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 06:19 PM Response to Reply #39 |
50. also, my understanding was that he did consult with senior members of Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 06:50 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Consulting Congress is the minimum ONLY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Tue Mar-22-11 07:16 AM Response to Reply #52 |
73. Serbia, Bosnia, Pannama, Grenada etc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Tue Mar-22-11 07:13 AM Response to Reply #50 |
72. and the Armed Services and intelligence committees and leaders on both sides |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 06:06 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. That was then, this is now - as is true for so many things... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 06:09 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. This is NOT a unilateral effort. Although you seem to be doing a good job of ignoring that fact. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 06:11 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Regarding war powers, the word "unilateral" does not refer to other countries, but to Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 06:48 PM Response to Reply #43 |
51. Unilateral, in this context, does not refer to other countries but rather Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
47. Well, at least this guarantees DK a flurry of Television appearances! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Change Happens
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
54. Is he and Nader the true loony left? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 07:57 PM Response to Reply #54 |
62. I'm in the loony left -- But I have my limits and both Nader and DK take it too far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Change Happens
![]() |
Tue Mar-22-11 04:51 AM Response to Reply #62 |
68. Same here...I agree with you 100%, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Keith Bee
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
59. Me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
60. Not over the top Constitution wise. Just over the top given the US of today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 11:05 PM Response to Reply #60 |
66. Can you name the last President who didn't bomb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Tue Mar-22-11 07:24 AM Response to Reply #66 |
74. Great question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Mon Mar-21-11 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
67. Someone needs to primary his stupid ass in a year or so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue Mar-22-11 04:55 AM Response to Original message |
69. rec. excellent OP, Armstead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Tue Mar-22-11 07:02 AM Response to Original message |
71. Well - CNN is for what is likely the first time treating him as an important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Tue Mar-22-11 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
75. There are better reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC