|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:20 AM Original message |
If Julian Assange had gotten his way Osama would be alive and at large |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
1. You're going to get a lot of responses to this post in a jiffy, pop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcane1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
2. Quite a leap of logic you have there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 04:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
53. more of a stretch than a leap. No, more of a stench. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marblehead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:22 AM Original message |
OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
3. Well that's some major "contortion" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:27 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:35 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. But isn't it true.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:41 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. First of all, it is Wikileaks (NOT Wickileaks) and further.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
31. your condescending remark is the fail on this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 02:23 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. I see no one here putting Assange on a pedestal--your fail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 02:58 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. of course you (the general you) are: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 03:44 PM Response to Reply #41 |
49. Many on the "right" felt that way about Daniel Ellsberg after the leak of Pentagon Papers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wait Wut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 03:14 PM Response to Reply #31 |
43. +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
32. Assange did say he believes in NO government secrets! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 02:22 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. Got a link for that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
65. your whole OP is based on a straw man argument - do you hate Assange and Glenn Greenwald both? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
5. Deleted message |
lamp_shade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:37 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. hmmmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
7. Assange would have withheld that information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
30. that's comforting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 02:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Exactly, why shouldn't our elected officials/our own government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lamp_shade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
9. I believe you're right. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. hmmmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
10. I have not heard him 'claim' that at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
luvspeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
12. I believe you too, and here's proof... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. You do realize that was only released YESTERDAY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinnie From Indy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
13. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReturnoftheDjedi (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
14. Assange thinks America is the enemy. He might actually be saddened by Bin Laden's passing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:04 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Deleted message |
ReturnoftheDjedi (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. please don't throw me in that briar patch!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:05 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Deleted message |
ReturnoftheDjedi (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. do you support leaking national secrets to our enemies?? Julian Assange does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 03:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
52. exposing our military fragging kids from a gunship supercedes your authoritarian needs.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 04:20 PM Response to Reply #21 |
54. what a crock. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xfundy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
15. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:03 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. And the Wikileak that I'm waiting for is the proof that Bush, or his cronies, knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
16. Deleted message |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
22. Assange vetted what he released. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
33. I wish I could unrec your post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 03:39 PM Response to Reply #33 |
47. What you said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 03:43 PM Response to Reply #33 |
48. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xocet (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
23. That is deep cover, Karl. I am impressed by your foresight. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pmorlan1 (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
24. unrec |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
25. You are so right, and it's dangerous for all of us. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Astrad (374 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
26. If gun advocates got their way Bin Laden would still be alive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:53 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. now this comment is just stoooopid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
27. LOLOLOLOL!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
34. If Assange Really Does Believe That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:55 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. How is it that you are OK with Assange deciding what can be redacted? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 02:00 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. The Issue Here Was Whether Assange Supported |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 02:59 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. ahh I complete understand why you are avoiding the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seaglass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 03:25 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Is it just Assange that you despise or is it whistleblowers in general? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 03:46 PM Response to Reply #44 |
50. HAA HAA...down to making ASS-u-m-ptions. Wrong n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DisgustipatedinCA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 08:10 PM Response to Reply #50 |
58. wait...you were asked a yes/no question, and came back with 'wrong'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:12 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. you assumed your question could be answered yes or no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 03:50 PM Response to Reply #42 |
51. I Am Not Glorifying Assange or Assuming He is a Hero |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vattel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 08:25 PM Response to Reply #51 |
59. How dare you directly address the claims made in the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
45. WTF? OVER! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coccom (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
46. Maybe, Maybe Not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
55. Wasn't Assanage more interested in exposing LIES our Government tells us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 05:02 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Actually, no. He is an Anarchist. Just look at the document dumps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swilton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
57. Total hyperbole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
60. You must have bump your head while waking up from bed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
61. Exactomundo, Grasshopper. Your post will not be popular, though. Even tho it's true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:17 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
64. Oh I get it, you are attacking Assange and Glenn Greenwald, anyone else? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC