|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
bigdarryl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 10:55 AM Original message |
Can someone explain the logic that more jobs where created than expected but the rate went up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
1. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
2. More people got back into the job market who had been out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigdarryl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 11:01 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. but the so called experts for months have been saying there needs to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 11:04 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. who is the "they" that are trying to make the President look bad? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 11:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. If they count how many are paying FICA tax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 03:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. That would show an employment figure, but not a rate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 09:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Correct but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
3. We always expected it would be that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
6. The rate went up because a lot of people who had no job for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 11:18 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. How do they determine when an uncounted person is seriously looking for work vs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. They ask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 12:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. But you're talking about people working or collecting, not the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 01:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Nope - the survey does not only focus on those collecting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
7. 2 different surveys. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karnac (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
9. the other issue is some people HAVE to look for work now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TTUBatfan2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 12:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Regarding unemployment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 12:38 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. So nobody at all left a job at McD's last month? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karnac (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 12:59 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. thats different. mcdonalds opend up many NEW sites last month. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 11:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
24. no... if you're collecting unemployment you're required to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yavin4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
10. Here's An Example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
11. More people enter the workforce looking for jobs, but supply is less than demand for them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
20. IMHO, the best measurement for the short term trajectory is Gallup's job market index |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
21. People returning to the job market |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
22. 133,000 people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Sep 25th 2024, 06:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC