Hutzpa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-03-11 09:45 AM
Original message |
| No, WATERBOARDING did not lead into killing Bin Laden |
|
This is the BS meme being perpetuated now by M$M. What this tells me is that there are those who are bent on rewriting history which is to continue misleading the uninitiated into thinking that the Bush administration was partly responsible for the killing of Bin Laden, to those people I asked this of you, If they had this information, WHY DID'NT THEY FOLLOW UP ON THAT INFORMATION? WHY DID THEY SPEND 8 YEARS CHASING BIN LADEN AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WASTED just to tells us that Bin Laden is not of importance right now, instead what we have witness is the financial support of a country which turns out to have been abhoring this terrorist for five to six years while all along giving the Bush administration a false sense of responsibility into thinking they were doing the Right Thing.
These same people are now trying to reclaim accolades for something they completely botched up. It is laughable to say the least but most importantly it exposes their ineptitude to grasp what's important and what's not, what a shame.
|
JaneQPublic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-03-11 09:52 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. They're using the fallacy that whatever goes before an event causes it |
|
By that logic, we could just as easily say that waterboarding led to the resurgence of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the terrorist attack at Ft. Hood, and the underwear bomber.
|
Hutzpa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-03-11 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. My feeling also is that these same individuals |
|
Wants to continue the spying on Americans to further their hidden perspective/agendas, hence the collective whispers of this is not over blah blah....... another thing worth mentioning is that narrative seems to come from the same culprits whom failed to get him in the first place.
One can't help but to put on a tinfoil and ask I wonder why? Is it because it funds their collective verbiage about terrorism or does it continue disparaging the world into false fear which in turn destabilizes the world's economy.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Mar 09th 2026, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message |