|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:06 PM Original message |
Waukesha County: City of Brookfield Recount Starts With Ballot Bags Dispute (six new bags) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HelenWheels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. Another dirty deed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PufPuf23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Sure seems to me that the counts from any improperly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. According to DUer PeaceNikki, they do count them separately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:24 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. I think all tallied it's 14 bags that have been an issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. That's not true: "all but one of the bags had some sort of problem" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:34 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Thanks for the correction. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 07:22 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. In your experience have the bags with problems always been weighted for Prosser? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. I have been doing that math. I am a professional data geek so this has been fascinating for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 07:32 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Thanks, PeaceNikki. I'm so glad you're there with eyes on the process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 07:35 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. I *wish* there was clear evidence of fraud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 07:39 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Me too. Clear evidence would put it to rest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 07:41 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Indeed. In order for them to do it, they would have had to alter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 08:43 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. But does it have to be more weighted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pab Sungenis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why is the Kloppenberg campaign not IN COURT RIGHT NOW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I'm sure they will be after the count is fininshed.,,, and it will be contentious without a doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. I don't favor disenfranchisement of voters, so I am sympathic to the judge's ruling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. ... "A future court to decide." I think are the key words there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Stealing the election is not disenfranchisement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:25 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Er... you have any facts based off of your statement? You have some answers we don't know about ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. If it looks like a duck, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I agree 100 % with you. It's a little early to say treason has been commited is all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cieran_WI (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 03:22 PM Response to Reply #14 |
31. And everyone said it was too early to say Walker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spotbird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. Why have security precautions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. The procedures for validating that the ballots have not been tampered with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:20 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Broken chain of custody yes... disenfranchised? ...not yet, but perhaps soon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
4. recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
8. Their excuse boils down to that they use a knowingly-inadequate system ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. They strike me as sloppy... and that goes back to Nichols. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. It's an interesting twist on not sending enough voting machines. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Heh... I sure with all the national attentions procedure will not be a concern henceforth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
18. Are they keeping those ballots separate? If not, they should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:15 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I'm sure they are. I'd guess PeaceNikki will fill us in before long..with pictures I wouldn't doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. Yes. Every bag challenged in my presence is counted separately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 03:12 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
19. And of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:23 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. It's not quite that simple, but this IS getting seriously effed up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:30 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. I think you have the right sense for this. We've been so screwed in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
29. It is time to redo this election with a new official in charge of this area. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadisonMike (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-05-11 10:17 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. I know its been said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Sep 24th 2024, 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC