|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
OneGrassRoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 08:17 AM Original message |
About strict constitutionalists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. If a law doesn't say something, it doesn't say something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 08:30 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Thank you. :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 11:27 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. I'm asuming you're being sarcastic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 08:28 AM Response to Original message |
2. Most "strict constructionists" don't really care that much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 08:31 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Now THAT makes a lot of sense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VEI (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. You must be talking with some crazy "strict constructionists" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 12:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Then I've never spoken to a sane one. All I have spoken with claim you have no rights, not ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AdrianInOcala (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
5. strict constitutionalists want the constitution strictly followed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 08:44 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Great example. Thanks very much. :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
6. T. Jefferson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 08:46 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Gold. Pure Gold. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VEI (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 11:53 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. the Constitution sets up a process to change wrong in the document. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
10. My experience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xicano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
13. I find this thread to be confusing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
14. I think the comparison you made is a good one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
15. If you ask me, I think strict constructionism is nothing but cover for corruption on the bench. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gravel Democrat (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
16. you wrote: "I personally don't see how any document can ever be literally interpreted..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 03:08 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I've seen people argue about the definition of the most basic words... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Travelman (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-06-11 03:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. A. FREAKING. MEN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Jun 21st 2024, 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC