|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
chillspike
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:10 PM Original message |
Pakistan may have known. My Q is: Did Bush know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. I can't buy it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chillspike
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I would tend to agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chillspike
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. No because once Bush was out of office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:29 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. What is it you think is afoot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chillspike
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:39 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. I just think we should all get a lot nosier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:53 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Some of those are good questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebration
![]() |
Sun May-08-11 01:08 PM Response to Reply #20 |
65. not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reggie the dog
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 04:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
42. W himself said he was not concerned with bin laden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 05:00 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. and? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reggie the dog
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 05:23 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. perhaps a family think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 05:34 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. See, this is what so often goes wrong with conspiracies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wind Dancer
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 06:07 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. Since when did asking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crickets
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 07:31 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Thank you. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. This is not asking questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chillspike
![]() |
Sun May-08-11 03:49 AM Response to Reply #56 |
62. Well, it actually is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Getting OBL early on was definitely NOT what the Bush gang |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I was talking about the last election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chillspike
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:41 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. or would not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:54 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. So bush allowed the election to be lost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chillspike
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 07:28 PM Response to Reply #21 |
54. I don't think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. and how was he worth anything to them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chillspike
![]() |
Sun May-08-11 06:29 AM Response to Reply #57 |
64. They WANTED to stay in power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shimmergal
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 11:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
59. Not sure Bush and his neocon buddies were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
24. How would it have benefitted the MIC to have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:18 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Has killing him now ended the WOT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:29 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Unless a deal had been made with Musharaff ~ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:38 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. All meaningless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 04:05 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. And what is your explanation??? Why didn't Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 04:33 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 05:00 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. And you post as much CT as you accuse others of doing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 05:04 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Perhaps but at least... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gin
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:09 PM Response to Reply #13 |
26. Bin Ladin wasn't important in 08...bush had to set the stage for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:19 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. So why keep OBL alive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:27 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Because they knew the crash was coming, maybe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:32 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Would that still have not been much easier with a repug in office? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 09:11 PM Response to Reply #35 |
58. You got me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chillspike
![]() |
Sun May-08-11 03:37 AM Response to Reply #30 |
61. Do you forget Republicans were using OBL to stoke fear? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
4. I really don't know but he sure managed to trot out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Will it be * who trots out the next (and supposedly last) tape? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chillspike
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I wonder what intelligence was gathered at Bin Laden's compound |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:10 PM Response to Reply #6 |
27. A lady can hope right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Sun May-08-11 01:18 AM Response to Reply #6 |
60. Well, cheney practically moved into cia headquarters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimlup
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
7. I agree with you that Bush and his henchmen may have had more to do ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chillspike
![]() |
Sun May-08-11 03:54 AM Response to Reply #7 |
63. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
8. Hah. I would be more inclined to believe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pintobean
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
12. We need to do a controlled demolition of the 3 story mansion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. The Us has no right to do anything with the mansion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pintobean
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. It could have been a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:09 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. I did not see it as a joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
think4yourself
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 05:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
49. Thank You. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthside
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
14. Bush Knew Where bin Laden Was All Along |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nxt1
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Everyone knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
31. Not only Bin Laden but also Mullah Omar and his people, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 05:51 PM Response to Reply #16 |
50. Bush specifically said that he would not send troops into Pakistan to get Bin Laden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
19. I'm thinking if he did, it was all a sop to Pakistan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
22. His father was once the head of the CIA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lindsey
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. That's been my question too. It'll be very interesting to see what's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vehl
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
32. He..or his Cheney might have ..check this post of mine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
37. Well, first of all, Bush was Never in Charge. Secondly, Letting Osama Continue to Live.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
40. i think he just didn't care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 04:46 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. The simplest, most likely explanation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #41 |
52. The simplest explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
46. Possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
think4yourself
![]() |
Sat May-07-11 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
51. What I still want to know is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 06:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC