|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
oberliner
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:16 PM Original message |
Statement from the newspaper that removed Hillary Clinton from the White House photo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. Um, he didn't read the "fine print"...what a lame-ass "apology.' nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
2. Smells like B |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:32 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Yup and bullshit sure smells bad when one tracks it into the house with them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hifiguy
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. +1 on that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. It's not that they denigrate women. It's that they denigrate THEMSELVES... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. That's a man isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Yeah, it's technically a man, but he's in drag. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:25 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Gotcha - thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xfundy
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
21. I usually refer to them as "Acidic" Jews |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hifiguy
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:09 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. That sort of Judaism strikes me as the analog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
4. Assholes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rock
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
5. Because of laws of modesty, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. Since when to JEWISH laws of modesty ever involve non-Jews??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 08:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
48. They shouldn't publish photos of ANYONE then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
8. what a stinking load it is to claim that their policies and beliefs don't denigrate women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
10. That beats "to those I might have offended" as the lamest non-apology apolgy ever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mz Pip
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
11. Laws of modesty? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
12. Keep Digging! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
13. What a load of BS. Do they really think people will excuse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
14. More religious assholes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ratty
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
17. "...which in no way relegates them to a lower status" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:48 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Weird logic, I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ratty
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:01 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I don't think they can believe it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
20. Awesome. We cry out for, and demand, an apology because of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:08 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. It wasn't done in error, it was done on purpose. They acknowledge that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:10 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. yes and no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:27 PM Response to Reply #22 |
43. Yes, and they issued an apology. It is now time to turn the page, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:34 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. That's fine, just wanted to correct the misperception that this was a simple honest error |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 08:31 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. So we have "pseudo outrage" about a non-apology? No, it wasn't an apology but an explanation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 03:11 AM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Or, there is this line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:37 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. How is photoshopping two important women out of an historic image.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:21 PM Response to Reply #29 |
40. Y'know-- just a quick few hundred slips of the hand/mouse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:25 PM Response to Reply #29 |
42. A small paper with limited readership by a small group wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:43 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Geronimo was not the name of the mission.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:21 PM Response to Reply #30 |
41. Deleted message |
riderinthestorm
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
24. When fundy, patriarchal religions try to make the excuse that they are actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
somone
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
25. "Sorry we got caught" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TroglodyteScholar
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
26. Thank GOD they removed the HIGHLY SUGGESTIVE females from that photo... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
28. Holy crap they PHOTOSHOPPED her out!. When I was reading about this earlier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:46 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Even if I had seen only the "rabbi-ed" photo, I would have guessed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
32. Bull flaming cookies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
33. "...we do not publish photos of women,"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Blue Flower
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
34. Did they never publish a photo of Golda Meir? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:13 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. Headline reads "That Big Blank Spot Indicating a Person Who Shall Not Be Named Or Photographed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:46 PM Response to Reply #38 |
45. The pronoun protocol alone would be, well, I'd like to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
36. This is bullshit and they are sexist pigs. "Modesty" forbids pictures of women but not of men? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
37. So what would they have done if she were president? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:19 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. ha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
46. THEN WHY DID THEY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
47. bs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
49. Rabbi, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marybourg
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
51. So when the Prime Minister of Israel holds a conversation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 12:38 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Do their readers even know what Golda Meir looked like? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 03:42 AM Response to Reply #53 |
56. A similar paper posted a photo of the newest Israeli cabinet and photoshopped out the women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
52. God, please protect me from your followers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liquorice
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
54. Where in the Jewish religion does it say you can't have pictures of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 05:08 AM Response to Reply #54 |
57. Have you read the Torah recently? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PufPuf23
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 05:15 AM Response to Original message |
58. Mentally ill sick fuck liars. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
59. Well, when you put it that way, I guess it's OK then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC