|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 01:37 AM Original message |
Texas becomes first state to ban 'intrusive' TSA security pat downs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. Nude flying is our only hope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 06:08 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Well, it would ensure I was the only one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buns_of_Fire
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 04:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
81. "Nekkid Airlines" -- an idea whose time has (finally) come! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brettdale
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
97. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
2. K&R! Good on ya, Texas! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Keith Bee
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 07:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
41. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojeoux
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 01:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. We need a sonar glove, that you use on yourself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 01:44 AM Response to Original message |
4. well this will be interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 05:16 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Yes, a few people are going to be disappointed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 04:48 AM Response to Reply #11 |
57. Public safety is not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:36 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. and to paraphrase, public safety isn't a suicide pact either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:20 AM Response to Reply #11 |
58. I don't think it is a sincere embrace of authoritarianism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 06:10 AM Response to Reply #4 |
15. Freedom finger bangs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 12:25 AM Response to Reply #15 |
47. I missed that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 11:53 AM Response to Reply #4 |
32. LOL!!!!! "freedom fingerbangs" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
5. good for texas! k & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 01:54 AM Response to Original message |
6. Happy to hear this. Hope it starts a shift from from the guilty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 02:17 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Yes, that almost seems to be thing of the past, innocent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
43. Let's hope it is a turning point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prometheus Bound
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 02:00 AM Response to Original message |
7. Oh Dear Lord! The terrorists have won. No one is safe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 02:50 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. We'll be okay, I don't think George Bush flies on commercial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 04:53 AM Response to Original message |
10. Good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 05:27 AM Response to Original message |
12. Wow, Texas does get something right once in awhile, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NotThisTime
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 10:44 AM Response to Reply #12 |
25. I agree, probably the only thing they've done right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 06:09 AM Response to Original message |
14. As a Californian I admit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pecwae
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 07:31 AM Response to Original message |
16. Good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 10:03 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Yes, that's what I am for also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
17. Kicked and strongly recommended. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
somone
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 07:44 AM Response to Original message |
18. Every state should do this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
19. Kick. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
21. Did you know that the mother... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 10:53 AM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Did you know that the guy who took the picture took it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 11:26 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Yet, the mother of the baby that was supposedly "abused"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 11:39 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Yes, I noticed you do that a lot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 11:41 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Research the Supremacy Clause of the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 01:00 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. I am aware of the issue of supremecy, in fact it is mentioned in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #31 |
42. The constitution however, SHOULD trump congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 02:28 AM Response to Reply #42 |
52. "toot sweet" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:37 PM Response to Reply #52 |
89. Where in the Constitution are your exceptions? They were carved out by subsequent authoritarian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:44 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. Read Marbury v Madison... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
22. Last law I liked made in Texas was the red light camera law here in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 02:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. Yes, they can be proud to lead the way on this ~ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gormy Cuss
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
23. Interesting. Touching breasts and buttocks were part of the older version of TSA pat-downs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
24. Lt. Crusher of star treck gets his nuts crushed at LAX by the TSA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 11:22 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. As he should be! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 05:13 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. Ah, c'mon, who doesn't want to kick Wesley Crusher in the nuts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thanks_imjustlurking
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
29. This is good, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 01:28 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Maybe this is a good sign, do you think? I imagine that the legislature |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thanks_imjustlurking
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 10:07 AM Response to Reply #34 |
63. There's a fair amound of pressure on the school funding issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 08:34 PM Response to Reply #63 |
108. Frustrating I'm sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibDemAlways
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
37. Bad enough that adults are subjected to this ridiculous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 07:29 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Definitely Homeland Security needs to go. The name alone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibDemAlways
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 08:59 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. I would vote for any Presidential candidate who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
38. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
40. If the Senate hasn't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iris
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
45. Weird coincedence. I just flew out of TX last week and the girl behind me in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 12:22 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Why don't you read the linked article and the OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 12:56 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. The subject line of the OP is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. The Texas House voted to ban TSA patdowns. That is a fact! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 02:09 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. You already posted it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 03:30 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. The vote was 100% against the TSA. I know you don't like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gravel Democrat
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 04:07 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. +1,000,000!! Tell IT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 04:21 AM Response to Reply #54 |
56. "May it please the Court... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 12:47 PM Response to Reply #54 |
70. Lol, good question, Gravel Democrat! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 04:13 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. "The Senate will pass it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 06:01 AM Response to Reply #55 |
60. For the supremacy clause to apply, there first must be a federal law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 06:28 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 03:51 PM Response to Reply #62 |
76. Deleted sub-thread |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 12:44 PM Response to Reply #60 |
69. Thank you Sen. ~ n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 12:12 PM Response to Reply #55 |
65. What you're seeing is the American people's Constitutional rights position. I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 12:25 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. Are you saying security checkpoints are... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 12:43 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. It's not about YOU. It's about this country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 01:08 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. Sabrina... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 03:05 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. I have already had the 'security checkpoint' argument many times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 03:31 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. "You are defending these tactics. Why?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:44 PM Response to Reply #74 |
92. PETN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:50 PM Response to Reply #92 |
95. I'll be glad to watch you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 06:32 PM Response to Reply #95 |
100. Funny, they weren't dismissed in the past. Which is why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 06:28 PM Response to Reply #92 |
99. If you have already posted it on DU before.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 06:53 PM Response to Reply #99 |
101. Because he's a well-known security expert? Who has been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 08:06 PM Response to Reply #101 |
106. "fighting that fascist regime's " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 08:27 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. And a classic example of strawmen, speaking of irony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 08:36 PM Response to Reply #107 |
109. You mean the one who... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 08:39 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. I'm not surprised you know 'no one in the Democratic Party who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 08:42 PM Response to Reply #110 |
113. Why don't you find some praise of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 09:13 PM Response to Reply #113 |
116. You would lose that bet, but that's not something I wish to discuss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 09:17 PM Response to Reply #116 |
117. Do you know the difference between a... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #117 |
118. Lol, always shifting gears! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 09:24 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. Sabrina.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 11:13 PM Response to Reply #119 |
124. Yes, any old disrespected radical can have a conversation with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 11:37 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. Sabrina.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 12:10 AM Response to Reply #125 |
128. I feel sorry for you, I really do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 12:17 AM Response to Reply #128 |
129. If "these women are highly respected in Democratic circles" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 12:41 AM Response to Reply #129 |
130. Fighting to restore the rule of law in this country is not a contest, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 12:46 AM Response to Reply #130 |
132. No, you and the "senator"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 01:39 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. "It's not about YOU" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 04:20 PM Response to Reply #72 |
77. In the same of "public safety" I propose every sharp edge in the country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 04:28 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Is this one of those... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 04:50 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. I would hope they are immediately recognizable to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 04:56 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
U4ikLefty
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:11 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. ^^^fear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:14 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. ^^^ hit and run. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:17 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. and in what PLAUSIBLE scenario do you see yourself fight for your life in an airplane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:20 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. A guy trying to ignite... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:47 PM Response to Reply #86 |
93. So would you also support full cavity searches to board airplanes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #93 |
96. In your case? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 06:12 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. But if PETN is such a danger shouldn't everyone have a cavity search? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 07:02 PM Response to Reply #86 |
103. And now that you have the facts, how will he be prevented from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 11:53 PM Response to Reply #82 |
126. The problem is that even with "pat downs", you still may very well have to fight for your life... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 11:56 PM Response to Reply #126 |
127. You want travelers to carry guns on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 12:46 AM Response to Reply #127 |
131. I've been a military aviation mechanic for over 20 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 12:48 AM Response to Reply #131 |
133. Yes.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Mon May-16-11 12:53 AM Response to Reply #133 |
134. And your credentials are....? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Tue May-17-11 08:46 AM Response to Reply #133 |
135. Nothing? Seriously? Hmmmmm..... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 06:58 PM Response to Reply #79 |
102. You asked about PETN. You have received your answer, twice now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 08:40 PM Response to Reply #102 |
112. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 09:06 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. Nice try, at ignoring the information you have now been given |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 09:09 PM Response to Reply #114 |
115. Serious question.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 09:24 PM Response to Reply #115 |
120. I don't fall for these tactics. Try them on someone who does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 09:29 PM Response to Reply #120 |
121. I have asked you this question multiple times... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 10:21 PM Response to Reply #121 |
123. The point is that isn't the only way to conceal something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 02:17 AM Response to Original message |
51. LOL @Texas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Modern_Matthew
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 06:22 AM Response to Original message |
61. Texas does something right. Many kudos for this victory. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemperEadem
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
64. so far this year, I've flown 3 times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 12:14 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Good to hear they weren't using them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
75. Thanks, Texas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
78. Good! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
87. Good! This shit needs to stop! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:29 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. Yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:37 PM Response to Reply #88 |
90. And don't forgot those people who arrogantly complain in line about TSA procedures... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
94. Texas hate vs. TSA hate. Go! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
104. Once texas does it and others do the tide will turn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 07:52 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. I just read that as many as ten states are now pushing similar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
111. Deleted message |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun May-15-11 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
122. k |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC