|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
peoli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:47 AM Original message |
Scientists cure cancer, but no one takes notice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zoeisright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
1. No link to a scientific study in that article. I don't think this is credible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:53 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Hope does not need peer reviews or scientific studies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 07:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
58. Deleted message |
eomer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. Published in the journal Cancer Cell. Here is a link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 03:40 PM Response to Reply #15 |
42. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robmx (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-11 12:42 AM Response to Reply #42 |
144. DCA a cure for cancer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robmx (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-11 01:05 AM Response to Reply #144 |
145. DCA a cure for cancer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 08:38 AM Response to Reply #15 |
106. In light of the research completed, the title of this thread is a tad overstated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 11:31 AM Response to Reply #15 |
128. Published 4 years ago. Here is status from 1 year ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malikshah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 02:39 PM Response to Reply #128 |
138. Thanks-- and interesting albeit short read. The door doesn't appear to have been closed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tclambert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 03:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
43. It's in wikipedia already. It names doctors and identifies a few caveats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
toddwv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 12:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
84. I'm sorry but this doesn't pass the sniff test. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dotymed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 07:38 AM Response to Reply #84 |
99. I wish you were correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 11:59 AM Response to Reply #99 |
133. If cancer is the most lucrative business, then diabletes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 12:28 AM Response to Reply #1 |
85. you may have seen this already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drm604 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 09:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
112. It does link to an article at the University of Alberta website. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
2. Everyone should kick this today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Though I'm skeptical, count me in for a kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 07:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
66. Punt! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
3. There is no one illness called "cancer." This article is BS. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 09:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
78. Also, Mitochondria are *part" of the cell, not a type of cell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 02:32 AM Response to Reply #78 |
91. The quoted bit is somewhat confusing as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllyCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 08:41 AM Response to Reply #78 |
109. And the cell needs the mitochondria to function (read: whole body to function) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drm604 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 09:41 AM Response to Reply #109 |
113. If I'm understanding the article correctly that's not really true of at least some cancer cells. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YellowRubberDuckie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
4. They won't cure cancer. There's no money in it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 01:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. And "they" also control nationalized health care systems in other countries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YellowRubberDuckie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 02:27 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. They'll just shut it up for as long as they can in this country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 02:33 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. I see, and we have no way of knowing what is going on in other countries, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YellowRubberDuckie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 07:04 PM Response to Reply #34 |
57. I am being bitter and illogical... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 10:16 PM Response to Reply #57 |
79. Sorry, but I'm obsessive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 03:03 AM Response to Reply #79 |
93. +1 well said. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silent3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 07:51 AM Response to Reply #79 |
100. +1! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YellowRubberDuckie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 08:16 AM Response to Reply #79 |
103. You can understand that I am bitter and irrational for a reason, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 10:43 AM Response to Reply #103 |
122. I can understand that many people read and believe things posted online |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YellowRubberDuckie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 12:53 PM Response to Reply #122 |
134. I was speaking about the one doctor we dealt with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 07:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
63. You are correct that some ONCs are money grubbing whores |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emcguffie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #32 |
65. A fellow named Royal Raymond Rife cured some cases of -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarsInHerHair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:03 PM Response to Reply #65 |
83. copy & paste it, paragraph by paragraph if need be in a pm to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emcguffie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 10:55 AM Response to Reply #83 |
126. Okay. I'll do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emcguffie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 10:59 AM Response to Reply #83 |
127. Better yet, here's a link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 07:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
60. Nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YellowRubberDuckie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 07:09 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. I'm being bitter and irrational. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #61 |
94. If you post irrational crap, expect to be called on it. Get used to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YellowRubberDuckie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 08:17 AM Response to Reply #94 |
105. I was expecting SOMEONE to get that I wasn't entirely serious... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 03:30 PM Response to Reply #105 |
139. Your posts bear no discernible difference from the sad comments of desperate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YellowRubberDuckie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 08:44 PM Response to Reply #139 |
143. I guess I kinda don't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-11 10:35 AM Response to Reply #143 |
149. as you are apparently without the basic tools to enjoy meaningful gain from this exchange |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 02:36 AM Response to Reply #60 |
92. When I apply your comment to BP or TEPCO, I start laughing uncontrollably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 09:43 AM Response to Reply #92 |
114. Here's the difference between BP and Big Pharma |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 10:48 AM Response to Reply #92 |
124. ...and those peddling miracle cures are deeply ethical, of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 09:19 AM Response to Reply #60 |
111. Actions of the pharmaceutical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-11 10:00 AM Response to Reply #111 |
147. Yes they do. But they are NOT sitting on cures. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BREMPRO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 10:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
80. there is for the canadian govt... since they have single payer govt run health care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTPatriot (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 06:09 AM Response to Reply #80 |
98. The Flaw in Your Assumption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polly7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 08:17 AM Response to Reply #98 |
104. What appropriate treatment are Canadians not receiving that you think we should be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 10:31 AM Response to Reply #104 |
119. you'll probably never get an answer to that question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polly7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 11:36 AM Response to Reply #119 |
130. I agree with you, because the post I replied to was complete bull*. Hit and runner. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 11:33 AM Response to Reply #98 |
129. Lol... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebenaube (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
5. First off... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 07:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
67. That jumped out at me too. Mitochondria are not cells. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
7. Pharmaceutical companies can't make money off this procedure ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elfin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. Interesting BUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Fortunately I don't have cancer, but I know a woman whose medication |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
themadstork (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 04:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
49. same reason my fiance moved to a canadian hospital from the US for her treatment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabatha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
8. Here is a wiki page with many links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamtechus (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. The article is from 2007 (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roadie70 (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
9. Oh no! Not a cure for Cancer! How will the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
11. EVERYTHING you need to know about DCA here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredStembottom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
12. No time to go into detail..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Yep. Not that that'll stop people from reacting to it like it isn't BS. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 04:08 PM Response to Reply #13 |
45. And was I ever depressingly right. Ugh. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
17. From the people who do research: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 07:09 PM Response to Reply #17 |
62. +1000...the "they don't want to cure cancer" is the one of the most offensive conspiracy theories |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 09:37 PM Response to Reply #17 |
74. What is true is that drug companies won't be doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cmd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 08:10 AM Response to Reply #17 |
101. I have so much respect for my oncology nurses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tpsbmam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 02:16 PM Response to Reply #101 |
135. Deserved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 10:21 AM Response to Reply #17 |
118. Thanks for the dose of sanity from a professional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tpsbmam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 06:51 PM Response to Reply #17 |
140. The article is so grossly inaccurate and poorly written, it was hard to get by that to begin with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
19. In vitro toxicity to cancer cells does not equate to a cure for cancer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zoeisright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 02:34 PM Response to Reply #19 |
35. Exactly. The body is so much more complicated than cells in a test tube. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
20. I thought DCA was toxic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
21. EVERY cell is a "mitochondria cell...." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NotThisTime (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 02:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
31. And what about the mitochondria that don't function properly thereby causing mito disorders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 04:10 PM Response to Reply #31 |
47. what about them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 04:29 PM Response to Reply #21 |
51. yep, thank you for posting that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sofa king (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 08:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
102. Or every human cell has a mitochondrial cell within it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kceres (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
22. If it sounds too good to be true , , , , |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
23. Seems too good to be true, but I hope it is true. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yo_Mama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
24. Unrec for misinformation, possibility of human harm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Overseas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
26. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
27. Pharmaceutical companies would kibosh it faster than X-On-us would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 10:35 AM Response to Reply #27 |
121. No they wouldn't - not a parallel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 08:25 PM Response to Reply #121 |
142. Pharmaceutical nor Exxon " employees" don't have anymore control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-11 09:52 AM Response to Reply #142 |
146. the employees make the discoveries - they'd keep quiet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
28. mitochondria are organelles within cells, not cells. glycolysis = conversion of glucose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 03:15 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. Maybe they're speaking in the ontological sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 03:57 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. i doubt it too. there is a factual basis behind the article, but the article was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Keith Bee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
29. Maybe they cured someone born in late July-early August of pneumonia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrsBrady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
30. i found the direct article from the university from 2007 that your link is referring to in your OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 02:29 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. the article does not say it is a simple solution to cure all cancers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrsBrady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 04:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
50. i didn't post any opinion, simply the original article n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 04:41 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Sorry, I'm just a bit sensitive on this issue. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
36. HUGE K & R !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 03:12 AM Response to Reply #36 |
95. W H Y ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diane in sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
37. If they found this in Canada then they can use their national health system to do studies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
39. :runs out to stock up on DCA before they make it illegal: n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
40. None of the links I could trace gave the names of the researchers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUnspeakable (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
41. Bookmarking for later |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
46. Whenever you see a post about any biomedical finding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 09:12 PM Response to Reply #46 |
73. Yup I agree. I really love nih.gov and if you look up med info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
48. This seems wildly inaccurate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
53. amazing if true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElboRuum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
54. The mitochondria line makes me call bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
55. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
56. Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for Sodium Dichloroacetate ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Riftaxe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
59. A much better discovery then the perpetual motion machine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mistertrickster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
64. Bogus alert--This is NO WAY a cancer cure. Not even that promising. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
68. so socialized medicine country found the cure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zoeisright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 10:50 PM Response to Reply #68 |
82. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Curmudgeoness (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
69. True or not, I would try this if I was diagnosed with cancer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 08:27 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. I'm with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
andym (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
70. Not a cancer cure, but under investigation as a treatment for glioblastoma |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
72. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
75. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OwnedByFerrets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
76. I wish we could get some concrete confirmation of this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Courtesy Flush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
77. NOT a cure!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boudica the Lyoness (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
81. I was researching dichloroacetate a few months ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
86. Mitochondria are not 'human cells.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
87. K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
88. The mitochondria is not a cell, and it does not fight cancer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
89. Unrec for scientific illiteracy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
farmboxer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 02:09 AM Response to Original message |
90. Corporate Drug companies will never allow a cure for cancer in America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 10:43 AM Response to Reply #90 |
123. Even for their own families? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorksied (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 03:54 AM Response to Original message |
96. this is amazing... and I'm not suprised it is getting no coverage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dipsydoodle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 04:23 AM Response to Original message |
97. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatacountry09 (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
107. Not Sure it's Exactly True... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeroysphitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
108. this story sounds so familiar... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
110. Sounds to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drm604 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
115. That links to an article from 2007. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seafan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
116. Link to NewScientist article from 2007 about this anti-cancer drug and DU discussion here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EvolveOrConvolve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
117. I can't believe this bullshit has over 100 recs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 10:52 AM Response to Reply #117 |
125. I'm completely unsurprised, honestly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 11:39 AM Response to Reply #117 |
132. Are you kidding? I'm surprised it's so few, honestly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 02:32 PM Response to Reply #117 |
137. I am completely UNsurprised. This site is full of scientific illiterates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-11 10:37 AM Response to Reply #137 |
150. country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
120. well, here is hoping it does cure cancer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Juche (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
131. It isn't a cure though, it is an agent that inhibits glycolysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
136. LOL, these morons don't even know what mitochondria are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-15-11 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
141. rec + THANKS! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-11 10:52 AM Response to Reply #141 |
151. Ha. You couldn't rec this nonsense. It was after the 24hr period. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-16-11 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
148. Mitochondria are organelles - not cells - they make ATP - not proteins or anything else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Sep 26th 2024, 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC