|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 11:56 AM Original message |
84-year-old man allegedly beaten by police officer after calling 911 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
1. Forget it Jake, it's Alabama.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 12:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. My conclusion too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 12:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I'm in GA and white too.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MattBaggins
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. Citizen's arrest in Alabama does exist AFAIK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicalboi
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 12:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Gomer put Barney under citizens arrest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. Hope sure ain't fair in Fairhope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandiFan1290
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
6. My sister just moved from Fairhope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Golden Raisin
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. O'er the land of the free |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabear
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
7. One sweet note in this horrific story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
8. $250K lawsuit against Fairhope filed 3 May 2011 for alleged events of 5 May 2009 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojeoux
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. This is hope-full. Why do they still have this guy on the job? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
9. Deleted message |
Exultant Democracy
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 06:41 PM Response to Reply #9 |
42. I think it's funny, but you are going to hurt the southern contingents feelings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rebubula
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:02 PM Response to Reply #42 |
54. LOLZ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojeoux
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
11. Poor Old Guy, and Officer Trent Scott is still on the job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hassin Bin Sober
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
12. My new motto: Don't get the law involved. (with apologies to Dr. Nick Riviera) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:11 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. absolutely best motto ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
13. Take note that RawStory's "source"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:13 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Oh, sure. Uh-huh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Duh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Deleted message |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:42 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I am suggesting that people get both sides of the story before... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:54 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. The idea -- that opposite parties in a litigation, might have different versions of events, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Thanks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:48 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. "Duh" ? Really? Gosh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 01:58 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. I don't think you were "simply agreeing with my insight" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 02:14 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Yet, you did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 02:22 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. You're assuming the elderly man was beaten up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 02:32 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Deleted message |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 02:35 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. "We need more vocal advocates of police violence" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 02:46 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Relax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 02:51 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. It's not "okay"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 02:59 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. I can't tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. No, dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 04:18 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. I have no problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 04:26 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. If you have more "insight" on this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 04:39 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. I was being kind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 04:42 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. No, you weren't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 07:31 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Mere speculation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 08:02 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. For the third time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smirkymonkey
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:16 PM Response to Reply #25 |
78. Yeah, first of all, he was OLD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slutticus
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:30 PM Response to Reply #16 |
88. Guilty until proven innocent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 11:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
47. What H2O Man said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 02:09 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Let me make sure I get this straight... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:09 PM Response to Reply #48 |
75. Your martyrdom is duly noted... as always. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:21 PM Response to Reply #75 |
82. Yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
26. kick. Hope the victim gets justice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 02:24 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. If he is, in fact, a... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
35. Horrendous if true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
40. When an ambulance arrived Ofcr Scott sent it away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 04:47 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Again, all these things are... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 08:13 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. The article states that a superior officer arrived and called the ambulance back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-19-11 08:37 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Which still doesn't mean the cop... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 10:49 AM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Unfortunately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace4ever
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 11:16 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Like the IMF Head story, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 11:48 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Just about the most pointless thing in the world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 11:54 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. People aren't merely... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 11:57 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Yes. They are expressing opinions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. No, they are not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:10 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Again. They get to do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:11 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. And, I didn't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:11 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. So what's the problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:12 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. I don't know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:24 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. My problem is that with your standards no one should ever discuss a news story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:31 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. You might want to look at what... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Yeah, it might not be accurate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. It is written ENTIRELY from the point of view of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:39 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Yes. It does indeed report the facts from one side of the story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:41 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. Advising people to get all the facts before drawing conclusions isn't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:43 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. No, but it sure is annoying and pointless and it can feel like an attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:46 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. So, you falsely accused me of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:47 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Attack may be a strong word, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:50 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. I pointed out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:04 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. "The "ready, fire, aim" factor is far too strong at DU." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:06 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. What would you call it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:06 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. I would call that not just pointing out the story is onesided n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:09 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:11 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Well, people can disagree with you and still be progressive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:19 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. Discarding... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:21 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. Yeah. They didn't interpret the facts the way you did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:25 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. Claims aren't facts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:33 PM Response to Reply #85 |
89. You're right, They aren't. So what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:39 PM Response to Reply #89 |
92. Blatantly disparaging fundamental fairness is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:41 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. It's a comment about a news story on a message board. Not a verdict on a jury. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:46 PM Response to Reply #93 |
95. Yeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:48 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. They are being no more unfair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:09 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. And if someone wants to make a preliminary judgement based on a story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:17 PM Response to Reply #74 |
79. They weren't merely making... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:19 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. Really. You expected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:23 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. Correction... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:26 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. I don't know. Why don't you ask him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:28 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. Yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:38 PM Response to Reply #87 |
91. You're starting to argue with me like I've taken a side on the story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:35 PM Response to Reply #79 |
90. It depends on what the freeper did and what you're defending them for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:43 PM Response to Reply #90 |
94. You're totally missing the point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:47 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. No, you are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:58 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. Excuse me for having higher expectatations of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:59 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. All I can say is, oh well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 01:58 PM Response to Reply #94 |
99. And because it isn't a jury, and because it doesn't affect anyone's lives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amerigo Vespucci
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
63. Some cops save lives, some are chronically disconnected human beings who suck ass...vigorously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
101. No opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC