|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 06:45 PM Original message |
U.S. Government Wants To Censor Search Engines And Browsers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLoner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, if DU disappears I guess we will know what happened. K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 06:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. DU really isn't 'underground' anymore... it's pretty mainstream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
2. k&r nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indianademocrat91 (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. Good for Google |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 06:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. "When will the assault on the Internet be done?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Incitatus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 10:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. It's funny to hear that from Google. I thought they were doing the same thing for China. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indianademocrat91 (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-20-11 12:04 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. I think the Chinese government was censoring Google |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obxhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
6. They have a lot of quotes to hide out there. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
7. That'll go down in flames the moment a judge looks at it, but still, argh. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Depends which judge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jp11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
9. Nice we can look to a big company like google to look after our freedoms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 10:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. I wouldn't count on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
10. Why the hell do they give these kind of laws such Orwellian names? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:39 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Oh, you mean like the "Help America Vote" (the way we want) act? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 10:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. To prevent their opponents from voting against them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AsahinaKimi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
11. The Internet is the only thing keeping us from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lbrtbell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
13. And I'll just bet Obama will veto that legislation instantly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
14. That's like making a list of book titles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
15. Hatch is a dumb ass. He introduced a bill to make it illegal to have a firewall. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
19. Was going to make a coment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 19th 2024, 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC