|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
William769
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 02:50 PM Original message |
What the hell are they putting in the water in San Francisco? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. Oh, dear, where have you been? This was discussed a few months ago, IIRC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 02:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Sorry I missed it completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. If you've seen other circumcision threads here, you probably know what was argued. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drale
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. It's punishment from John Muir for destroying the Hetch Hetchy Valley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. Why on earth do you think San Franciscans want to do that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. How can you read the article when it's a video? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. so you've decided all San Franciscans are crazy because something's going to be voted on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Deleted message |
CreekDog
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:24 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. Well things don't make it onto the ballot because they have majority support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 06:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
32. Sarah Palin made it to a ballot /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 06:58 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Not in a place like San Francisco. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 07:02 PM Response to Reply #12 |
39. Only 10% of registered voters are needed to qualify a proposition for the ballot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandySF
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. It's all true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:27 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. so you're saying because it's on the ballot then we all support it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 09:45 PM Response to Reply #11 |
48. You know, you can email, call, visit, your supervisor and put in your 2 cents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
4. Well, in the 50s, radioactive materials were dumped near the Farallon Islands. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 02:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. San Franciscans HAVE NOT voted on this yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rebubula
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. LOL... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. i don't personally care what he thinks of me or us --but it's right to point out a flawed argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Self delete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 09:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
49. And the Farallons are a primary great white shark feeding ground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. "They" equals a group, not the entire city |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
6. Ethics and reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. What do you do with Muslims and Jews then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 05:58 PM Response to Reply #22 |
30. yep. tis a puzzlement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 06:20 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I really don't think the ACLU will defend FGM on free speech or any other grounds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 06:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
35. grrr. because one truly is mutilation. that you can compare the removal of the clitoris |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 06:39 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. my point is not that they are equivalent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandySF
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
13. Because it's easier than dealing with tough issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. I loved the City when I visited there and I loved the people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandySF
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:11 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. I live in SF and love it with all my heart. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AsahinaKimi
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. As a native San Franciscan, I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Throd
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 07:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
41. Symbolism over substance. 'Tis the Frisco way! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 09:44 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. And for the most part. You would be wrong. How do I know this? I actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
14. It's Nanny Staters Paradise nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:11 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. SO you're in favor of a parent's unfettered right to hack pieces off their infant children? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 07:24 PM Response to Reply #19 |
42. oh jeez |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 08:22 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. So, fettered right, then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 08:27 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. oh jeez |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 08:28 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. I take it you have nothing to contribute to this conversation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 10:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
52. Personally, I find it barbaric.. It is slicing and removing a part of a human being. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
18. Maybe there are foreskins in the water? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
21. Nanny Statism at its finest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Another defender of parental rights to hack off pieces of their infant children's bodies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 06:24 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. You can prepare them just like calamari |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwassa
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 10:15 PM Response to Reply #33 |
51. I was thinking of frying them, like pork rinds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
29. This bit of law-making silliness aside....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 06:28 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. marmar, it is possible for you to live your life by what you regard as a higher set of standards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
36. FYI, it is the corporate conservadems that are pushing the e-cig ban. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
40. San Francisky?...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 09:40 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. So did you drive or did you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri May-20-11 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
50. Whatever it is, I want more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC