I wonder if Richard Trumka will support Republicans who want to ban birth control.

[LoZoccolo]

[demosincebirth]

1. I think he means that the money trough will be a little smaller, to dems. if they

don't shape up and look at who got them elected.

[aquart]

2. I'm pretty sure that has nothing to do with a single thing he said.

But do try to whip up a frenzy against organized labor.

[MichiganVote]

3. In case you missed it, free and pro choice reproductive health care is already banned

And the Dem's HAVE abandoned women.

[OHdem10]

4. At the present time, the Union support a handful of Republicans

who support Union Issues

[blondeatlast]

5. Since he only speaks for the Teamsters on labor issues, personally, he just might

if the anti-choice RRRepublican supports labor better than the Democrat.

To my knowledge, he doesn't let his own personal views on non-labor issues be known, nor does he claim to speak for anti-choice or choice candidates.

Really, LZ, it isn't that difficult to understand.

[teamster633]

12. Trumka doesn't speak for the Teamsters, he heads the AFL-CIO.

[bluetex]

6. I'm not gonna' worry too much...

...about it. At the end of the day...where are they gonna' go?


The black vote and the labor vote are two demographics we can always count on. And, the latino vote is comming around.

[mmonk]

8. Labor has been shrinking.

The Firefighters Union has already decided to pull back the purse strings. Labor is not a slam dunk to be taken for granted anymore. They are under seige and know it.

[cali]

7. how illogical can you possibly get, dear?

[pintobean]

10. Rhetorical question, right?

[cali]

11. righto.

:hi:

[LAGC]

9. Your contempt for organized labor is noted. (n/t)

[blindpig]

13. If he makes good it will be the best thing to happen for labor

in 50 years.

The Democratic Party has been the false friend of labor for decades, time to end that abusive relationship.

[dbt]

14. Is yet another shit statement.

Innit?

INNIT?

:hi: