|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Bandit
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 04:32 PM Original message |
What is the first hypothesis for Intelligent Design? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zoeisright
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. Step 1: disable logical reasoning ability in brain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drpepper67
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 05:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. I like the "Watchmaker" arguement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 06:48 PM Response to Reply #18 |
31. A Watchmaker presumes that Intelligence is dependent on/limited to a separate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lob1
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. I believe your assumptions are wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 04:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. ID is positioned as a scientific theory, not a religious belief. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lob1
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 04:39 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. It's a scientific theory presented by non-scientists? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. Its first (only) Hypothisist is that Evolution doesn't explain everything yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJvR
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
5. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Electric Monk
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
6. As I understand it, it's something like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
8. Biblica Scientifica |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
9. I believe the very foundation is that life is to complex to have developed independently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d_r
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
10. sensible people have really messed up in this whole issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
11. The first hypothesis- There are underlying, universal principals that exist independantly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 05:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. iow - religious belief with no place in any science classroom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 06:45 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. My statement/hypothesis is a very basic Philosophical position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 07:04 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
12. Hypothesis 1: Creationism is correct and scientists just won't accept this, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vroomvroom
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
13. K&R -- Religion is an Embarrassment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
14. Find a Church and you'll find it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucian
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
15. Intelligent Design isn't a science. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
16. Intelligent design is the new name for creationism, according to a 2007 court ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eddie Haskell
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
17. Geometry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 05:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Like my post above, you have pointed to an implicit order that can be discerned through |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 05:42 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. LOL. please explain this mathematical construct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eddie Haskell
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 05:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 06:09 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. well, it's almost worth talking to my ex about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eddie Haskell
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 06:21 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. It's just math and there's a proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 06:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. If it is a mathematical formula that is testable - no, it's not faith |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eddie Haskell
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 06:34 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Could be, but on the other hand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 06:47 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. when theoretical mathematics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eddie Haskell
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 09:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. The question was what's the first hypothesis for intelligent design |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 09:44 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. evolution isn't about first causes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eddie Haskell
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 09:59 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. I believe evolution is the unintended consequence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 10:17 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. that's a belief, not science |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eddie Haskell
![]() |
Tue May-24-11 07:40 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Science explains what we think we know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Tue May-24-11 12:57 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. hugs n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOG PERSON
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
22. a supposed need for a first cause of everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
24. It may be important to know how the National Academy of Sciences defines terms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Mon May-23-11 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
37. Intelligent Design presumes there is an intelligent designer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy
![]() |
Tue May-24-11 07:53 AM Response to Original message |
39. The very first hypothesis? That all of the scientifically arrived at ideas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Scribe
![]() |
Tue May-24-11 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
40. Does DU no longer have a religion forum? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC