Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 04:48 PM
Original message |
| GOP on verge of allowing Military cuts instead of tax hikes. |
|
They understand they just can not allow the US to default on it's obligations but have backed themselves into a corner with their NO TAXES of any sort pledge.. They will allow some substantial cuts in the Military budget instead...I think this is the deal that is going to be cut...
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 04:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. well, the military can't put money directly into their bank accounts |
Andy823
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Donnachaidh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. I don't believe it -- many southern red states depend on MIC |
|
They'd sooner see everyone's granny ground up for dog food than give up their military welfare. This is a ploy, AFAIC..
|
Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 6. The article in the Seattle Times says GOP leaders say "significant cuts" |
|
Whatever that means in GOP speak...:shrug:
|
Motown_Johnny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 7. closing foreign military bases and moving that personnel back to the states |
|
would actually help those economies
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 9. Only if you keep them on the Federal payroll. |
|
If not they will just be added to the unemployed.
|
The Big Vetolski
(436 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 21. When you're right, you're right. nt |
Motown_Johnny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 25. all military personnel would still be in the service |
|
I am not suggesting they be discharged
|
Donnachaidh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 16. And if those state economies depend on supplying those bases? |
|
Moving the troops home to no jobs is a good thing?
Look, I'm not arguing against your point - but many of these states have NO backup plan other than to keep feeding the MIC beast. Georgia's unemployment is ticking upwards - and significant cuts would mean many more jobs lost in the State.
:shrug:
|
Motown_Johnny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 26. the troops will still be in the military |
|
they would not be discharged just because they are stationed back in the US
They will still need to be supplied and if the bases need to be expanded to accommodate more troops stationed there then it may create some construction jobs
|
MadHound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 04:51 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. My bet is token military cuts, |
|
Enough to say "hey, we cut the military also", but not enough to mean anything. A couple of billion at best.
Meanwhile, the rest of it will be taken out of our hides.
|
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. The military industrial complex is a segment of the bigger rich constituents. |
|
The GOP has to choose to cater the smaller group or all the wealthy donors.
|
LiberalAndProud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 04:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. The speculation is killing me. |
Ozymanithrax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Pay and allowances? Military medical centers? Maintenace of structures on military bases?
or
Government contracts on weapons systems? Contracts for civilian security teams (mercenaries)? Government develoment of new systems?
I doubt they will cut the lifeline from large corporations. I suspect they will be token cuts that will hurt individual members and communities.
|
The Big Vetolski
(436 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 22. You make WAY too much sense, and so are probably right. nt |
TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 04:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. I would take that deal. |
|
Doubly so if it means the Pentagon finally puts a bullet in the head of the Joint Strike Fighter.
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 04:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 11. Expect some Democrats to piss and moan about this too |
|
Not every politician who is for gluttonous military spending is a Republican.
|
The Big Vetolski
(436 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
Matariki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 05:01 PM
Response to Original message |
| 13. Although those cuts will probably be to stuff like body armor |
|
And NOT to big ticket weapons systems that help line their and their bases's pockets.
I mean, troops are mostly made up of poor and middle class kids hoping to pay for college, so fuck 'em, right?
|
sufrommich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 14. There should be cuts to the military AND Bush's tax cuts for the |
|
wealthy should be allowed to lapse. I hope that is not off the table.
|
xiamiam
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 05:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 15. who is pushing for the military budget cuts? |
Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
Senior GOP lawmakers and Leadership aides said it would be far easier to build support for a debt-reduction package that cuts the Pentagon budget - a key Democratic demand - than one that raises revenue by tinkering with the tax code..
|
Pirate Smile
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
| 17. Take the military cuts since we will automatically revert to Clinton tax rates in 2013. |
RC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
| 19. Ahh, like we did last year? |
Pirate Smile
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
| 20. Incentives are different in 2013. It is after the election. The 2010 deal was to get what they could |
|
as stimulus with unemployment insurance extension, payroll tax cut, keep taxes from going up on middle class & get to DADT repeal, Start Treaty, 9/11 Responders, etc.
I think in 2013 you just let them all go up. It happens automatically.
|
The Big Vetolski
(436 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-28-11 08:57 PM
Response to Original message |
| 27. Probably soldier's pay and benefits. They aren't going to close bases or end wars. |
|
Nor will they do anything to reduce the huge footprint that gives us Pax Americana.
|
jmowreader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-29-11 02:40 AM
Response to Original message |
| 28. If I was a Marine I'd be worried now |
|
They won't cut the Navy or Air Force because those are the glamour services--they get the most and best equipment, bases etc.
They also won't cut the Army because with two ground wars going on right now, and Army bases spread all over the Deep South, it'd be political suicide to defund the Army
The Marines, the Defense Department's favorite whipping boy, will take the brunt of any cuts.
A couple of weeks ago I went to a wedding and all my family was there, including my freeper brother who spends 100 percent of his home time working on Marine Corps League and Devil Dogs stuff. He likes to go into a room and go on and on about shit no one else in the family cares about, and you can't talk around him because he's loud. First it was the New York Yankees...he loves the Yankees, while everyone else in the family either likes the Mariners (most of them), the Houston Astros (one of my sisters lives in the Houston area) or you're me and don't give a fuck about baseball. There were a couple other topics I don't remember, and then he got into this big long spiel about how everyone at the Marine Corps League knows Obama is bad because he's going to disband the Marine Corps. He mentions this every time he comes home (he's a long-haul trucker) and normally we're all "Bob, Bob, the president isn't going to get rid of the Marines." This time I got pissed off, y'know? He tells the same bullshit story every time and we try to calm him down every time...this time I channeled Sam Kinison and yelled at the top of my lungs, "if you'd quit fucking voting for Republicans he wouldn't have to!" (My mother only got a mild heart attack over that one.)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Mar 02nd 2026, 09:55 AM
Response to Original message |