|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
cali
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:35 PM Original message |
up is down. Praise for Obama over this mess is ass backward. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piratefish08
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. +1 it's bizarro world around here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. Yes, listening to frothing at the mouth hatred of Obama over rumors this past week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broderick
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. SING it... We are letting the Republicans dictate the convo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raven
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. Cali, you are brave, you are correct.. Now duck. :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:39 PM Original message |
thanks raven, but it doesn't exactly take courage to post your opinion on a discussion board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piratefish08
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:42 PM Original message |
I stand with you Cali. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
26. She's wrong and it's too bad you fell for the rabid rumor-based attacks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:16 PM Response to Reply #26 |
48. It's too bad that you consistently fall for rhetoric while ignoring Obama's deeds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate
![]() |
Sat Jul-23-11 05:25 PM Response to Reply #48 |
71. Can you point to any deeds that benefit the poor at the expense of the rich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 09:33 PM Response to Reply #26 |
63. there isn't anything passed yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Speck Tater
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
4. I'm glad to see that reason still prevails in some corners of DU nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. he was willing to give up everything and the pukes said NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
7. Here is something I agree with: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. that hardly negates my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:45 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. What's your point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFab420
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:48 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. It was necessary if you've been following and contributing to the narrative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Sat Jul-23-11 05:09 PM Response to Reply #29 |
70. i.e., "Damage Control" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 09:23 PM Response to Reply #23 |
62. I'd rather be appreciating helpful POLICIES more than a press conference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
8. Because he clearly illustrated that the repukes ARE "The Party of No™" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:20 PM Response to Reply #8 |
50. It's not a sports game. It's people's LIVES that they're playing with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SusanaMontana41
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #50 |
60. Totally agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
9. Deleted message |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
11. Maybe just maybe he called their bluff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 09:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
64. I don't know if he would have cut the safety net |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
12. When someone hands you a pile of shit, you make a shit castle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
13. The is a lot like "He called us retarded!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. He = Rahm and yes, he most certainly did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. Yes Ruby. I'm sure Rahm called you retarded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:00 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. "Rahm Apologizes for Privately Calling Liberal Activists "Retarded"" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:04 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Looks like he was calling the attack ads "retarded". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:05 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. You run with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:08 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Who knows. Maybe he did call you "retarded". Just doesn't seem much of a rallying cry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:11 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Point taken, but there is a far cry from something being a rallying call and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:13 PM Response to Reply #13 |
44. +a brazillion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
14. "TAKE MY WIFE PLEASE!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohheckyeah
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
15. He even admitted he was willing to give them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:44 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. and take less in revenues than they called for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
16. Praise would be premature. It's more relief... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Sat Jul-23-11 05:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
69. Good post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
17. Thread after thread rejoicing because he got pissed off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eilen
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:12 PM Response to Reply #17 |
42. Yawn. I've seen this show before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
18. It's simple... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:12 PM Response to Reply #18 |
43. But...what if they took it?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 09:49 PM Response to Reply #43 |
65. They couldn't take it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
20. Maybe it's a chess move |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
22. Deleted sub-thread |
gratuitous
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
25. Sure we lost 48-10, but it coulda been a lot worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sad sally
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
27. Kinda' like "think how stupid the average person is, and realize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
28. My pleasure to unrec that nonsense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
30. did you hear Boehner? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:23 PM Response to Reply #30 |
53. That doesn't mean he wasn't willing to give massive cuts, it only means they wanted more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
32. K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
33. For me, there are some conflicting emotions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelly1mm
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
37. Because he made a great speech and called the rupublicans out. On the substance, well, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberalynn
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
39. I will thank the President , apologize to him, and eat crow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
40. Amazing ...I actually agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:19 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. Try not to let that happen again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaptRandom
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 09:49 PM Response to Reply #49 |
66. how magnanimous of you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
45. He's a great speaker, but not so great when it comes to taking action that doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swilton
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
46. Kickety Rickety |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
47. Thank you, cali. Well said. Rec'd (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
51. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
52. Deleted message |
bahrbearian
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
54. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
55. That's what I've been confused about. Why are people cheering? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
56. But, it's a Glorious Victory!! See Pyrrhus for precedent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cwydro
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
57. yes, nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SusanaMontana41
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
58. It isn't, cali. K&R. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
59. Deleted message |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
61. Oh bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jul-22-11 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
67. Deleted message |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Sat Jul-23-11 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
68. "nothing in return" Why are you ignoring the Tax Hikes Obama insisted on? Boehner walked out over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Sat Jul-23-11 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
72. Digby's right. Boehner is powerless to even accept unconditional surrender. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC