|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
markpkessinger
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 10:54 PM Original message |
The decent thing for the President to do before running for re-election ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. Do you do know that Pres. Obama preserved Pell Grants & protected SS/Medicare benefits in this plan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxymoron
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 10:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. How big of him. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 11:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Deleted message |
markpkessinger
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 11:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. He had to preserve those or risk losing the votes of some independents ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 11:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. lol! Funny, all I've been hearing lately were predictions he'd cut SS/Medicare benefits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
socialist_n_TN
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 10:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
51. What in the WORLD is your definition of "liberal"???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 11:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. He did not preserve SS and Medicare benefits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 09:05 PM Response to Reply #12 |
43. Yes actually, he did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 10:01 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 09:05 PM Response to Reply #12 |
44. Deleted message |
piratefish08
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 12:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
25. do you know that he ignored 78% of the country that said tax the rich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solomon
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 12:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
26. No, he don't know shit. That's why he wrote this crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 12:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
28. By the same token, so did W. Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 07:08 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lbrtbell
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 09:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
42. The WH "fact" sheet is a glorified press release |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. He will always look out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 10:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Don't talk about Bill Clinton that way... even if it's 100% true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 11:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. On a serious note - Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 11:21 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. he knew how to act it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 08:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
36. Yes, he's an excellent actor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 12:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
27. I thought she was talking about Kucinich...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 11:24 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. Can you explain how he was 'looking out for himself' when he didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 12:40 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Those "boys" are his well paid future. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 12:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 12:54 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. He thinks they do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 07:07 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Wrong again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 09:18 PM Response to Reply #33 |
46. Excuse me - how do you know how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 11:09 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. He wrote a thesis reconciling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 11:36 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. You didn't ask about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markpkessinger
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
7. The unreccing crew is on the job! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
8. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
9. Oh that's just sooooooo sad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 08:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
37. Sooooo are your poooooosts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
14. Yeah, right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 11:27 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. You are asking us to engage in hypotheticals when we must |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 01:09 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. You act like you would have had a choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
socialist_n_TN
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 10:21 PM Response to Reply #18 |
52. Geez, that makes WAY too much sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markpkessinger
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 12:01 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. This isn't about what the President has been able or unable to accomplish in anjy given area ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 01:06 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. I can't believe none of you actually think this through. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 10:12 PM Response to Reply #22 |
50. Maybe. But the corporations still come first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp
![]() |
Sun Jul-31-11 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
15. bullfuckingshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
21. Mega-R & K |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
29. I am very unhappy with what happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
30. Piffle...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
31. In reality, "liberal" Republicans need their own party. It was a MISTAKE to welcome them here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
35. Maybe if he ran as a Republican, he would start acting like a Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 08:25 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. My laugh of the day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
38. There are two memes currently allowed to roam freely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
40. Would prefer him to do an LBJ... And let someone else run! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberalynn
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 09:07 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philly_bob
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
41. High-falutin' language -- but an absurd & unrealistic suggestion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
47. However, he can do MUCH more for the Republican cause in the White House with a "D" after his name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awoke_in_2003
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
48. point one- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Mon Aug-01-11 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
55. Obama Bachman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC