|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
| FreeState
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:27 PM Original message |
| Breaking: House just passed DADT stand alone bill and Snowe becomes 61st Senator to support repeal |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redirish28
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Some Good news coming out of the Senate today. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| roguevalley
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 16. Should help Dan Choi get well, bless his magnificent heart. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| me b zola
|
Thu Dec-16-10 12:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 58. +100000 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| midnight
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:39 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 72. Thank you for thinking of this brave man. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Starry Messenger
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Holy crap, for reals?? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FreeState
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 6. I know... keeping my fingers crossed n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Starry Messenger
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 9. Fingers crossed here too! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Zenlitened
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Fingers crossed. - n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| elleng
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. EXCELLENT! Hope Dan Choi hears about this. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RKP5637
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. Recommend!!! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| defendandprotect
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Will Dems really help GOP lose such a huge wedge issue? Hope so--!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AlinPA
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 21. What about Nelson (NE), Pryor (AR)? They shoul be Nos. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tx4obama
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:48 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 74. Pryor is a yes. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. They only got 57 votes last time. How is she 61? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FreeState
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 11. Im looking for a list - the link to that article listed 61 (from Twitter) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FreeState
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. The 61 includes Brown and Murko |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Recursion
|
Thu Dec-16-10 09:49 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 42. They mean don't put it in an unamendable Defense authorization |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kenfrequed
|
Thu Dec-16-10 12:27 PM Response to Reply #42 |
| 60. There was a reason. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Recursion
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #60 |
| 69. I agree; Brown's election cracked that levee |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tx4obama
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 73. Snowe is #60. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| polmaven
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 22. Scott Brown and Murkowski |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CLANG
|
Thu Dec-16-10 01:53 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 66. The 'baggers gotta love Scott Brown! LOL!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Recursion
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:23 PM Response to Reply #66 |
| 70. Those were imported 'baggers |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rucky
|
Wed Dec-15-10 07:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 30. It's a standalone bill now. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tx4obama
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 76. Kirk is a maybe. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TexasObserver
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. recommend |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pab Sungenis
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. They support it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AlinPA
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:52 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 20. Of course, you nailed it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WolverineDG
|
Thu Dec-16-10 10:18 AM Response to Reply #13 |
| 47. Well, I certainly hope DADT will be resting in its place in the dustbin of history |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TriMera
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. k&r. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. Thank you, FreeState. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| catgirl
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. Yeah!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AlinPA
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. "Lucy" Snowe? At the last minute...whoops, yanks away the football. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Solly Mack
|
Wed Dec-15-10 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. K&R |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Sparkly
|
Wed Dec-15-10 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 23. Quick! Somebody tell the president to throw in the towel and compromise before progress breaks out!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Johonny
|
Wed Dec-15-10 06:05 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 25. perhaps he already did |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jamastiene
|
Wed Dec-15-10 06:28 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 28. +1 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CLANG
|
Thu Dec-16-10 01:55 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 67. He'll compromise to ASK if you must, TELL go to hell. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OneGrassRoot
|
Wed Dec-15-10 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. K&R! :) n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| onenote
|
Wed Dec-15-10 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 26. House vote included 15 Democrats opposed and 15 repubs voting aye |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Monk06
|
Wed Dec-15-10 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 27. And Freeperville is going appropriately ape shit over this. Love to see those dorks squirm and cry |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CLANG
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:03 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 68. Those people truly are insane |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MineralMan
|
Wed Dec-15-10 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. This is very good news. I'm surprised to see so many |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HERVEPA
|
Thu Dec-16-10 08:25 AM Response to Reply #29 |
| 38. Because of being disappointed on so many things so many times |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| spanone
|
Wed Dec-15-10 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. k&r great news!!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Scurrilous
|
Wed Dec-15-10 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. K & R |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Major Hogwash
|
Wed Dec-15-10 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. K&R |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pintobean
|
Thu Dec-16-10 11:07 AM Response to Reply #33 |
| 54. Why? Currently at +108 and climbing. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SidDithers
|
Wed Dec-15-10 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. K&R... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Occam Bandage
|
Wed Dec-15-10 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. K&R. Unexpectedly good news. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NuclearDem
|
Wed Dec-15-10 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. Didn't they say they'd support repeal with the Defense Authorization bill? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Recursion
|
Thu Dec-16-10 09:50 AM Response to Reply #36 |
| 43. No, it being part of the authorization was the problem |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tblue37
|
Wed Dec-15-10 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. hope hope hope hope hope hope hope ......................nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Myrina
|
Thu Dec-16-10 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
| 39. Watch this be the one bill POTUS vetos. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Recursion
|
Thu Dec-16-10 09:50 AM Response to Reply #39 |
| 44. Huh? He's been pushing Congress to do this for 2 years |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Robb
|
Thu Dec-16-10 09:54 AM Response to Reply #39 |
| 45. LOL |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadBadger
|
Thu Dec-16-10 10:40 AM Response to Reply #39 |
| 49. You do realize this is exactly what he tried to do from the beginning? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| racaulk
|
Thu Dec-16-10 10:42 AM Response to Reply #39 |
| 50. Not a chance. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kenfrequed
|
Thu Dec-16-10 10:55 AM Response to Reply #39 |
| 53. Highly unlikely |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadBadger
|
Thu Dec-16-10 11:09 AM Response to Reply #53 |
| 55. Lieberman has been leading the charge against DADT in the Senate. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kenfrequed
|
Thu Dec-16-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #55 |
| 59. Sure... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadBadger
|
Thu Dec-16-10 12:51 PM Response to Reply #59 |
| 62. You must be blind then. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kenfrequed
|
Thu Dec-16-10 01:44 PM Response to Reply #62 |
| 65. Of course... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dappleganger
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:51 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 77. I've been holding his feet to the wire for awhile... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| La Lioness Priyanka
|
Thu Dec-16-10 05:10 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 90. i doubt it. he's not dumb. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| madmax
|
Thu Dec-16-10 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
| 40. About damn time - Better be k&r nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bushisanidiot
|
Thu Dec-16-10 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
| 41. Excellent! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AllyCat
|
Thu Dec-16-10 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
| 46. Ticks me off that we now need 61 votes to do anything, but so glad this looks to pass |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| no limit
|
Thu Dec-16-10 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
| 48. I have my fingers crossed they actually pass this in the senate. But little hope at this point |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| racaulk
|
Thu Dec-16-10 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
| 51. Once again, I'm crossing my fingers and being cautiously optimistic. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kenfrequed
|
Thu Dec-16-10 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
| 52. Ah but... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wryter2000
|
Thu Dec-16-10 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
| 56. K& freaking R |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| myrna minx
|
Thu Dec-16-10 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 57. K&R - I really hope we get this. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TheKentuckian
|
Thu Dec-16-10 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 61. K&R |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| amyrose2712
|
Thu Dec-16-10 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 63. +++ |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GOPBasher
|
Thu Dec-16-10 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 64. It's not good news YET. I hope they take it up in the Senate before the new Congress. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TransitJohn
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 71. I predict if it passes, Obama will veto it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rosco T.
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:50 PM Response to Reply #71 |
| 75. Oh for Frack's sake..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tx4obama
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:55 PM Response to Reply #71 |
| 78. You are totatlly wrong. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Whisp
|
Thu Dec-16-10 03:15 PM Response to Reply #71 |
| 82. lol! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ikonoklast
|
Sat Dec-18-10 02:16 PM Response to Reply #71 |
| 91. No proof necessary. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Arkana
|
Sat Dec-18-10 04:06 PM Response to Reply #71 |
| 92. What the fuck? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SemperEadem
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 79. well, that didn't hurt, did it? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PhillySane
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 80. Great News! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jefferson23
|
Thu Dec-16-10 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 81. Oh please, let this happen! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| old mark
|
Thu Dec-16-10 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 83. Harry Reid seems determined to get this to pass while it still has a chance... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Drale
|
Thu Dec-16-10 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
| 84. Something good is getting done in Congress!!??!!??!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Politicub
|
Thu Dec-16-10 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 85. Please let this happen! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ashling
|
Thu Dec-16-10 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 86. Is that Snowe comment couched in the general GOP disclaimer |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bluerthanblue
|
Thu Dec-16-10 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 87. this is great news- K&R |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 1776Forever
|
Thu Dec-16-10 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 88. Lt. Daniel Choi, this one's for you! Salute! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mdmc
|
Thu Dec-16-10 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 89. r |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Feb 13th 2026, 01:58 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC