|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 02:57 PM Original message |
| Whatever happened to that NY DA who was going after Goldman Sachs, et. al.???? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| banned from Kos
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Goldman had no hand in the 2008 crisis |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 5. huh? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. Deleted message |
| banned from Kos
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 15. Right. So Goldman decieved another big fund and that fund never initiated action |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:26 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 19. So this is all made up stuff that never happened? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| banned from Kos
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:33 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 22. I acknowledge Goldman decieved another Big Fund. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 24. They committed a crime and you defend them. Says a lot about |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| banned from Kos
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:43 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 28. No one proved their "crime". No victim came forward. None at all. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:48 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 29. Your statement is so weak. Who says you have to be a bank to |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ArcticFox
|
Tue Oct-04-11 04:31 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 42. Who needs proof these days? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Romulox
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 31. You know, the good folks at KOS may have been on to something... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:51 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 33. I learned something today, it ain't a crime if you ain't a bank! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| banned from Kos
|
Tue Oct-04-11 04:20 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 38. Do you know anything about civil law? Why doesn't the "victim" sue Goldman? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Tue Oct-04-11 04:27 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 40. They will in time and GFS is going down for criminal activity. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| banned from Kos
|
Tue Oct-04-11 04:37 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 45. 7-8 years from now you will still be howling about why |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Tue Oct-04-11 05:00 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 47. You posted that fraud is okay as long as it is a company you |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| banned from Kos
|
Tue Oct-04-11 05:07 PM Response to Reply #47 |
| 49. you're lying - I don't use the term "fraud". |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Tue Oct-04-11 05:16 PM Response to Reply #49 |
| 50. Nice weasel words. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| girl gone mad
|
Tue Oct-04-11 04:47 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 46. They did become a bank holding company.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| red dog 1
|
Tue Oct-04-11 04:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 39. Goldman Sachs did have a hand in the crisis that's brewing today in Greece |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Tue Oct-04-11 04:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 41. Even so, the poster already admits he doesn't care if they committed |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| banned from Kos
|
Tue Oct-04-11 04:34 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 44. I did not say that - there is no crime proven. Period. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Tue Oct-04-11 05:01 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 48. Yes you did, you said fraud is a okay in your book. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| banned from Kos
|
Tue Oct-04-11 04:32 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 43. agree 100% - Greece got their money's worth from Goldman |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| red dog 1
|
Tue Oct-04-11 05:40 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 52. Correction to previous post. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. They were appointed another cabinet seat. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 9. No doubt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 16. Well if you look at this WSJ page, he has had nothing to do with |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 23. From that write-up, it looks like Mr. Vance |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:38 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 25. No, but you would think the WSJ would report on such activity. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 27. ;-) nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Trillo
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Scrubbed? Google News search for |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 7. good question |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RoccoR5955
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. Uhhh... He retired. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 10. Do you mean Cy Vance retired? or who? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RoccoR5955
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 12. No, not Vance, Morgenthau. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:25 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 18. My OP question was about Cy Vance, who in June '11 announced he was |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jtown1123
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Are you talking about Eric Schneiderman? He's still prosecuting |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 11. Did you read the article? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jtown1123
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 13. I saw that I was letting you know that the NY DA is still very involved. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RoccoR5955
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 14. But if Geitner does what he did to Spitzer, or threatens to |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jtown1123
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 17. I feel bad for Schneiderman but I hope he stays strong. He's going to piss everyone off |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:27 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 20. Only "almost"? nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| The Magistrate
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. Seems To Still Be In Action, Sir |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:39 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 26. COOL. Great to hear. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:50 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 32. Thanks! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| librechik
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. it's possible you have Vance mixed up with the State AG of New York Eric T. Schneiderman |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:58 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 35. No, I mean exactly who I said, Cy Vance, Manhatten DA. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| librechik
|
Tue Oct-04-11 04:15 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 37. ok, in that case, NOTHING has happened, Goldman Sachs has not responded |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 05:22 PM Response to Reply #37 |
| 51. I think some confusion was due to my typing "NY DA" in OP, instead of Manhatten DA |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| librechik
|
Tue Oct-04-11 06:11 PM Response to Reply #51 |
| 53. good to know NY has two crusading prosecutors interested in reining in WS n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 09:44 PM Response to Reply #53 |
| 54. Yes, yes, and hopefully they are cooperating w/ one another in the investigation. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| starroute
|
Tue Oct-04-11 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. You can find more if you search under "Cyrus Vance" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 99th_Monkey
|
Tue Oct-04-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 36. Actually, someone did answer my question, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Feb 23rd 2026, 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC