|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
| MadHound
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:30 PM Original message |
| Is the Obama administration trying to gin up a war with Iran? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Deleted message |
| TheWraith
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. No. Next ridiculous question? nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadHound
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. So why is Hillary going all hawkish over a minor sting operation? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| gratuitous
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Because it's "ridiculous," that's why! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TheWraith
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 7. Probably because Hillary is a hawk. Always has been. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RZM
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 10. Self detete. Wrong spot n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RZM
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 11. Hawkish with words. That's how we approach Iran. Becaue that's all we really can really do |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| apocalypsehow
|
Wed Oct-12-11 03:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 31. This "minor sting operation" amounts to an act of War by the government accused. Educate yourself. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadHound
|
Wed Oct-12-11 03:18 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 33. Really, an act of war? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| apocalypsehow
|
Wed Oct-12-11 03:21 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 34. Attempting to assassinate the ambassador(s) of a country on another nation's shores is the textbook |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadHound
|
Wed Oct-12-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 36. Umm, no |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| apocalypsehow
|
Wed Oct-12-11 03:45 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 38. And "guess what" (Sic), there have been many acts of War committed over the centuries that didn't |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Wed Oct-12-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 42. Deleted message |
| leveymg
|
Thu Oct-13-11 03:19 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 56. There's no evidence of official gov't involvement, except the US Gov't. You educate yourself. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bowens43
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. probably |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slay
|
Thu Oct-13-11 01:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 51. +1 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Divernan
|
Thu Oct-13-11 02:07 PM Response to Reply #51 |
| 55. He's gotta keep the big MIC campaign donors writing those checks |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Proud Liberal Dem
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. I certainly hope not (and doubt it) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ixion
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. That would be following the neocon agenda |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| newspeak
|
Thu Oct-13-11 01:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 48. that's right!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jaxx
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. You need to make clear that anything above "The US secretary of state has" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadHound
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:42 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 13. So now you want something besides quotations and links |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jaxx
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 19. Draw a line or something. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadHound
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 22. No, I assume that I'm dealing with pretty intelligent people who can read for content |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jaxx
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:57 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 26. Interesting. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadHound
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:59 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 27. ? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SpartanDem
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. Weren't people like you saying this during the last spat with Iran |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Fire Walk With Me
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. Weapons of Mass Distraction. And it's working. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. Deleted message |
| NightWatcher
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. Didn't Obama just put a PNACer on his Intel staff? (Zelikow) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DURHAM D
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:46 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 17. That has got to be Hillary's fault. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Better Believe It
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Any chance the Obama administration might release real evidence to back up the Iran gov't plot claim |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tularetom
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. Somebody needs to sit on Hillary |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DURHAM D
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:54 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 25. Read the AP article. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TBF
|
Wed Oct-12-11 03:14 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 32. Sure, that's it ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| chill_wind
|
Thu Oct-13-11 01:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 53. Rice is all over this too |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lunatica
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. I would think this is the perfect scenario for black ops operation like Obama likes |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FiveGoodMen
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 23. Sure looks that way |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| leveymg
|
Wed Oct-12-11 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. Whoever dreamed this one up, it looks like not many are taking it as a serious threat. Neocon Fail. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| monmouth
|
Wed Oct-12-11 03:00 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 28. It has FBI prints all over it IMO..n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| leveymg
|
Wed Oct-12-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 29. Lots of smudges and false positives. True. But, other Agencies probably involved. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| monmouth
|
Wed Oct-12-11 03:54 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 39. What also ran through my mind was Panetta being concerned his |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| leveymg
|
Wed Oct-12-11 04:32 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 44. I don't get the sense this was Leon's work, or Bob Gates', either. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hotler
|
Wed Oct-12-11 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. Yes. The pipeline must go through. eom. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dover
|
Wed Oct-12-11 05:21 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 46. Indeed. Follow the pipelines to the next war zone.. Here's the latest on Iran's pipelines > |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AntiFascist
|
Wed Oct-12-11 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. This match has been lit for a long time... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| durablend
|
Thu Oct-13-11 01:13 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 49. Of course we can afford this |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dover
|
Wed Oct-12-11 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. This from a nation who kills first and doesn't even bother to ask questions (a trial)? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| chill_wind
|
Thu Oct-13-11 01:39 PM Response to Reply #37 |
| 52. Biden: It's an outrageous *crime* to go around assassinating people. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Capitalocracy
|
Wed Oct-12-11 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 40. And simultaneously create justification for conflating drug trade and terrorism |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| woo me with science
|
Wed Oct-12-11 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 41. I fear this is exactly where we are headed. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tuesday Afternoon
|
Wed Oct-12-11 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 43. in a word - |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bvar22
|
Wed Oct-12-11 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 45. Well, that HAS been a targeted goal for PNAC, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| chill_wind
|
Thu Oct-13-11 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 47. K & R. They certainly are in high level diplomatic overdrive. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Thu Oct-13-11 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 50. Deleted message |
| RebelOne
|
Thu Oct-13-11 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 54. No way! We cannot afford another war!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Carolina
|
Thu Oct-13-11 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 57. YES |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 19th 2026, 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC