|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
| brentspeak
|
Thu Oct-13-11 07:22 PM Original message |
| Is an "Occupy White House" movement offshoot from OWS inevitable? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NNN0LHI
|
Thu Oct-13-11 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. You think our president deserves to be publicly humiliated? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| brentspeak
|
Thu Oct-13-11 07:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. Considering that American lives and livelihoods are needlessly lost as a result of his actions |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Thu Oct-13-11 07:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. Deleted message |
| flamingdem
|
Fri Oct-14-11 10:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 30. The Republicans attempt to humiliate him constantly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 951-Riverside
|
Fri Oct-14-11 02:09 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 17. Respect the office. Respect the president. Stop questioning him. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ThomWV
|
Fri Oct-14-11 09:42 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 25. Yes |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Marrah_G
|
Fri Oct-14-11 09:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 27. I believe many of his policies deserve protesting. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bvar22
|
Fri Oct-14-11 12:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 28. I wouldn't call it Public Humiliation. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Raksha
|
Thu Oct-13-11 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Humiliated? I picked up on a VERY different connotation |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tierra_y_Libertad
|
Thu Oct-13-11 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Humialiated? Naw. He does that himself whnever he "negotiates" with the Republicans. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jamastiene
|
Thu Oct-13-11 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Probably not. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| leftstreet
|
Thu Oct-13-11 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Wall Street is already Occupying the Whitehouse n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jamastiene
|
Thu Oct-13-11 07:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 9. Exactly. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ignis
|
Fri Oct-14-11 02:03 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 16. Zing! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ProudToBeBlueInRhody
|
Thu Oct-13-11 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Why not "Occupy Congress?" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| brentspeak
|
Thu Oct-13-11 07:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 10. Please read my OP again |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| geek tragedy
|
Thu Oct-13-11 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. Yeah, the far left NEVER protests on the sidewalk in front |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Solomon
|
Thu Oct-13-11 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. The tide is turning in spite of all the propaganda. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WHEN CRABS ROAR
|
Thu Oct-13-11 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. If you really do want change to come about, this is your chance |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Efilroft Sul
|
Thu Oct-13-11 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. Occupy K Street. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| anAustralianobserver
|
Thu Oct-13-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 15. good idea |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MFrohike
|
Fri Oct-14-11 02:12 AM Response to Reply #14 |
| 18. Brilliant |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Efilroft Sul
|
Fri Oct-14-11 09:32 AM Response to Reply #18 |
| 20. Thank you, my Lone Gunman friend! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Aerows
|
Fri Oct-14-11 09:38 AM Response to Reply #14 |
| 22. Absolutely |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| gkhouston
|
Fri Oct-14-11 09:39 AM Response to Reply #14 |
| 23. Good idea, but where? The only park that comes to mind is Woodley Park |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Efilroft Sul
|
Fri Oct-14-11 10:38 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 29. Honestly, I wasn't thinking of any park. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pampango
|
Fri Oct-14-11 06:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 19. Bipartisanship - tea party would love to help with an Occupy White House protest. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Sheepshank
|
Fri Oct-14-11 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
| 21. dumb, ignorant post. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dionysus
|
Fri Oct-14-11 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
| 24. ROFL, what a pile of fail... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ThomWV
|
Fri Oct-14-11 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
| 26. Unless Washington is not only Occupied but brought to a standstill nothing will happen |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| brooklynite
|
Fri Oct-14-11 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. We HAVE an "Occupy White House" movement...it's called a Presidential Election |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 19th 2026, 03:55 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC