Websites 'should carry libel risk for anonymous posts'

[dipsydoodle]

Websites should have protection from defamation cases if they act quickly to remove anonymous postings which prompt a complaint, a report says.

A joint parliamentary committee says it wants a "cultural shift" so that posts under pseudonyms are not considered "true, reliable or trustworthy".

It says websites which identify authors and publish complaints alongside comments should get legal protection.

>

Under the current law, websites are liable for defamatory statements made by their users. If they fail to take down a post when they receive a complaint, they risk being treated as the "primary publisher" of the statement.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15364774

[mwrguy]

1. They want to be able to come and find you

That's pretty scary.

[dkf]

2. UK though right?

[ProgressiveProfessor]

3. Indeed. A nation with serious free speech limitations