|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
| kpete
|
Mon Oct-24-11 09:00 PM Original message |
| This should piss off everyone |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Autumn
|
Mon Oct-24-11 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. It sure pisses me off |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RKP5637
|
Mon Oct-24-11 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Yep!!! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TheWraith
|
Mon Oct-24-11 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. It pisses off me, because it overstates the intellect and legitimacy of the Tea Party. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JVS
|
Mon Oct-24-11 10:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 8. +1 Also, dear cartoonist, tell us something we don't already know! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lumberjack_jeff
|
Tue Oct-25-11 09:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 14. But it accurately reflects their ability to vote. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Tue Oct-25-11 09:28 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 16. Exactly. How often does the Tea Party criticize the Citizens United decision? (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JDPriestly
|
Tue Oct-25-11 02:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 48. The Tea-Baggers aren't literate enough to understand it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Tue Oct-25-11 03:32 PM Response to Reply #48 |
| 57. BS. What's hard to understand about more corporate money in elections? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Enthusiast
|
Tue Oct-25-11 02:41 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 52. NEVER |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Tue Oct-25-11 03:33 PM Response to Reply #52 |
| 58. It is. It's a tiny amount of people... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bjobotts
|
Tue Oct-25-11 05:49 PM Response to Reply #58 |
| 67. The size of governmnt is the goal to repubs.Solutions come first to dems,size is secondary |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Erose999
|
Tue Oct-25-11 09:39 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 19. Indeed, the Tea Party is all for gov't authoritarianism against the poor/non-whites/non-xians, gays. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Sarah Ibarruri
|
Tue Oct-25-11 04:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 62. Me too. lol nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RoccoR5955
|
Mon Oct-24-11 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. Tis better to be pissed off. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Enrique
|
Mon Oct-24-11 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. this cuts through a lot of the crap that's out there |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| applegrove
|
Mon Oct-24-11 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. This graph equates the two sides with each other. Not true. Tea baggers are full of shit! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jakes Progress
|
Mon Oct-24-11 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. All but about 1% |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mindwalker_i
|
Mon Oct-24-11 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. The tea party started with a legitimate gripe |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Luminous Animal
|
Mon Oct-24-11 11:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 13. Nope. Their original gripe was mortgage relief. Santelli went on a rant about paying for others |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Tue Oct-25-11 09:33 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 17. No, they didn't. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MrMickeysMom
|
Mon Oct-24-11 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. I think if there are any thinking people left in this tea party... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DCKit
|
Mon Oct-24-11 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. save as "common ground.jpg". nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wickerwoman
|
Mon Oct-24-11 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. The problem is that you address corporations that are "too big to fail" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Tue Oct-25-11 09:37 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 18. Exactly, you can't solve the problems by removing regulations, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JDPriestly
|
Tue Oct-25-11 02:20 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 51. Without corporate financing and lobbying Congress all the time, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| vanbean
|
Tue Oct-25-11 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
| 15. Thanks, Kpete. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| occupyeverywhere
|
Tue Oct-25-11 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 20. Spread it around |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Erose999
|
Tue Oct-25-11 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
| 21. The "Tea Party" is a creation of the 1% and the corporations. It would not exist on its own merits |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tavalon
|
Tue Oct-25-11 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
| 22. This is why this isn't a left vs. right issue or a Democrat vs. Republican |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| patrice
|
Tue Oct-25-11 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
| 23. Proof that President Obama must be doing something right, everyone, Left to Right, is angry at him. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KoKo
|
Tue Oct-25-11 03:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 59. well....I guess that's one way of looking at it....n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wial
|
Tue Oct-25-11 04:58 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 64. evidence, perhaps, certainly not proof |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| harmonicon
|
Tue Oct-25-11 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
| 24. Bullshit. The "tea party" don't give a damn about big government. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KansDem
|
Tue Oct-25-11 12:11 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 25. Agreed... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HughBeaumont
|
Tue Oct-25-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 31. "Government" to TeaHadists, is dog-whistle for "Tax-n-Spend-o-Crats". |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ErikJ
|
Tue Oct-25-11 01:17 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 41. +1 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| patrice
|
Tue Oct-25-11 12:12 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 26. +111111111111111111111 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Tue Oct-25-11 12:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 29. Well said! (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hubert Flottz
|
Tue Oct-25-11 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 27. K&R |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WillyT
|
Tue Oct-25-11 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Desertrose
|
Tue Oct-25-11 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. K&R |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AlbertCat
|
Tue Oct-25-11 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. You left out one of the main complaints of the Teabaggers. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| humanityisfree
|
Tue Oct-25-11 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. Time to UNIFY |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ehrnst
|
Tue Oct-25-11 01:03 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 36. Not possible: They want to "Take America Back" from the demographic at OWS. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ehrnst
|
Tue Oct-25-11 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. It only pisses off baggers when there's a 'colored boy' in the White House. (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jim_Shorts
|
Tue Oct-25-11 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. Sorry, I'm not ready to sing kumbaya with a teavangelical |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ehrnst
|
Tue Oct-25-11 01:05 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 37. Yes - They mock progressives - which are the core of OWS. They HATE change when it's not white. (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Uncle Joe
|
Tue Oct-25-11 01:29 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 43. Then stay divided along racial or party affiliation lines and be consumed. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jim_Shorts
|
Tue Oct-25-11 02:17 PM Response to Reply #43 |
| 49. There is a reason the country is so f***ed up |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Uncle Joe
|
Tue Oct-25-11 02:47 PM Response to Reply #49 |
| 53. You can't "fix stupid" but you can enlighten the ignorant and people come to enlightenment |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jim_Shorts
|
Tue Oct-25-11 03:22 PM Response to Reply #53 |
| 54. Your time will be better spent trying to "enlighten" a moderate or someone with an open mind |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Uncle Joe
|
Tue Oct-25-11 03:31 PM Response to Reply #54 |
| 56. You seem to have an open mind; using your reason and objective criteria to make logical decisions, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jim_Shorts
|
Tue Oct-25-11 04:14 PM Response to Reply #56 |
| 61. Tell me, have you ever changed the mind of a tea bagger? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Uncle Joe
|
Tue Oct-25-11 04:53 PM Response to Reply #61 |
| 63. To the contrary, Hugo Black's initial selfish motivation matches up perfectly with the |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jim_Shorts
|
Tue Oct-25-11 05:41 PM Response to Reply #63 |
| 66. I think you give the teabaggers too much credit |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Uncle Joe
|
Tue Oct-25-11 06:03 PM Response to Reply #66 |
| 68. Then let us go back to the OP, does it make sense to you? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jim_Shorts
|
Tue Oct-25-11 06:36 PM Response to Reply #68 |
| 70. Should I start from the beginning lol? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| gauguin57
|
Tue Oct-25-11 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 38. Color me pissed! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Warren DeMontague
|
Tue Oct-25-11 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 39. The fucking teabaggers want to put gays & women who use birth control in prison. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ErikJ
|
Tue Oct-25-11 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 40. Can somebody put this in text to post it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Uncle Joe
|
Tue Oct-25-11 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 42. Kicked and recommended for connecting the dots. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Populist_Prole
|
Tue Oct-25-11 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 44. Thanks. Definitely worth saving that graphic. Although..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Uncle Joe
|
Tue Oct-25-11 01:41 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 45. That is a legitimate concern that has been warped by the corporate media. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Tue Oct-25-11 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 46. That would have pissed me off if it was something new I didn't |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tblue
|
Tue Oct-25-11 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 47. I'm not a good chart-reader, but it pisses me off anyway. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flakey_foont
|
Tue Oct-25-11 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 50. yep |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mosaic
|
Tue Oct-25-11 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 55. We need an Ammendment to Stop This |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Deep13
|
Tue Oct-25-11 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 60. Interesting, but I wish there were sources cited for the figures given. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Major Hogwash
|
Tue Oct-25-11 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 65. If our government wasn't corrupt, more people would vote. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tuesday Afternoon
|
Tue Oct-25-11 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 69. fucking A. finally, a diagram to show what I have been trying to explain |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Doctor_J
|
Tue Oct-25-11 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 71. This toon pisses me off |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kimsarah
|
Tue Oct-25-11 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 72. Obama hires ex-lobbyist |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| orbitalman
|
Tue Oct-25-11 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 73. Truly K & R |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Feb 14th 2026, 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC