|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
| kpete
|
Thu Dec-16-10 11:34 AM Original message |
| (Jimmy Carter) America Is Ready for a Gay President |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 33Greeper
|
Thu Dec-16-10 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. Rachel Maddow |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| me b zola
|
Thu Dec-16-10 01:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 16. I really think that should would, too |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dappleganger
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:48 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 20. Rachel is too damn nice. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Still a Democrat
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:40 AM Response to Reply #20 |
| 65. She might surprise you |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bushisanidiot
|
Thu Dec-16-10 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. The country, meaning the electorate, isn't. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AlbertCat
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 21. We won't have a gay president for at least another 50 years. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 09:57 AM Response to Reply #21 |
| 48. Too pessimistic, IMO. An out gay may not get your mom's vote, or even your sister's, but |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WillParkinson
|
Thu Dec-16-10 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. Oh please... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CurtEastPoint
|
Thu Dec-16-10 11:42 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. ...or serve openly in the military (fingers crossed!) n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CLANG
|
Thu Dec-16-10 01:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 17. And all the ruckus over BHO tells me we really weren't ready |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pitohui
|
Thu Dec-16-10 06:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 27. ready or not, he's here |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 09:42 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 43. I did. In fact, I believed it in 2004, after his speech at the Convention. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| karynnj
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:28 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 60. By 2007, a very large percent of the people on DU |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:11 AM Response to Reply #17 |
| 56. Some of the ruckus is about race. The rest is about his policies and behaviors. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 24601
|
Thu Dec-16-10 08:38 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 30. Is he that naive or was he just being provocative? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:00 AM Response to Reply #30 |
| 51. Neither. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 09:59 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 49. IMO, you and Jimmeh are both correct. Please see Reply 46. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Botany
|
Thu Dec-16-10 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. We already had a gay or bi President |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| shawn703
|
Thu Dec-16-10 12:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 10. I heard about Buchanan likely being gay |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pitohui
|
Thu Dec-16-10 06:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 26. we've had several gay presidents as far as i know |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:02 AM Response to Reply #10 |
| 52. While you're at it, look up Log Cabin Republicans. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PfcHammer
|
Thu Dec-16-10 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. Prolly had several that were on the DL |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DonCoquixote
|
Thu Dec-16-10 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. The GOP knows this |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Harry Monroe
|
Thu Dec-16-10 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Oh please, this country wasn't really ready for a black president!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:21 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 59. Please see Replies 46 and 56. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NobodyHere
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:42 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 67. Right |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Thu Dec-16-10 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. Deleted message |
| area51
|
Thu Dec-16-10 03:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 23. Yeah, that was my thought, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| La Lioness Priyanka
|
Thu Dec-16-10 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. lol. an american president not allowed to marry his husband or serve in the army |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| obxhead
|
Thu Dec-16-10 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. There is not an issue with gays to deal with. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Playinghardball
|
Thu Dec-16-10 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. Bernie Sanders for President!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KamaAina
|
Thu Dec-16-10 01:27 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 14. PLEASE tell me you're not insinuating anything about Sen. Sanders' sexual preference. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Playinghardball
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 18. Not at all... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:30 AM Response to Reply #18 |
| 61. What in your mind was the connection between Sanders and this thread? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| xxqqqzme
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:23 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 19. Did you mean Congressman Barney Frank? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Playinghardball
|
Thu Dec-16-10 02:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 22. No! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Behind the Aegis
|
Thu Dec-16-10 08:50 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 32. Because being "gay" would be an insult? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KamaAina
|
Thu Dec-16-10 09:24 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 34. Of course not. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Behind the Aegis
|
Fri Dec-17-10 12:35 AM Response to Reply #34 |
| 37. Awesome. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:07 AM Response to Reply #32 |
| 55. How about because being gay would be irrelevant to who should be Presdent? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HughBeaumont
|
Thu Dec-16-10 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. I'm just wondering when the hell we're going to elect a PROGRESSIVE president. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Matilda
|
Thu Dec-16-10 07:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 28. John F. Kennedy was a progressive, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HughBeaumont
|
Fri Dec-17-10 09:51 AM Response to Reply #28 |
| 47. 11-22-63 = Message Sent from the Oligarchs to the "People", IMO. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:33 AM Response to Reply #28 |
| 62. No, he was a liberal. So were Bobby and Teddy. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Matilda
|
Fri Dec-17-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #62 |
| 73. I did add the disclaimer that it was by the standards of his time. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| qb
|
Thu Dec-16-10 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. Does he mean in 2012? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:35 AM Response to Reply #24 |
| 63. The answer to your question is in the OP. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| goddess40
|
Thu Dec-16-10 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. I believe we've been there done that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:41 AM Response to Reply #25 |
| 66. Don't you think Maddow and Jimmeh meant "openly gay?" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Alamuti Lotus
|
Thu Dec-16-10 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. I would settle for a halfway decent president, don't really care who they fuck on the side |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bluenorthwest
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:00 AM Response to Reply #29 |
| 50. Um, this is not about a 'fuck on the side' this is about relationships |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sofa king
|
Thu Dec-16-10 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. My money is still on James Buchanan as the first. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Behind the Aegis
|
Thu Dec-16-10 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. Yeah, right. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AlphaCentauri
|
Thu Dec-16-10 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. of course |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Divine Discontent
|
Thu Dec-16-10 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. God bless President Carter! It's important for people of his stature to say things such as this.n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:49 AM Response to Reply #36 |
| 68. Kudos to the first poster on this thread to get it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| eridani
|
Fri Dec-17-10 04:05 AM Response to Original message |
| 38. I'm sure that the PTB can find one that's a corporate whore |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:51 AM Response to Reply #38 |
| 69. Liz Cheney for one. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Fumesucker
|
Fri Dec-17-10 04:29 AM Response to Original message |
| 39. But not an atheist one.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FLPanhandle
|
Fri Dec-17-10 09:44 AM Response to Reply #39 |
| 44. Nope. We couldn't be elected to city dogcatcher. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bluenorthwest
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:03 AM Response to Reply #44 |
| 53. Pete Stark is House Member from CA 13th since 1973 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FLPanhandle
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:39 AM Response to Reply #53 |
| 64. Cool. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:57 AM Response to Reply #39 |
| 70. Maybe the two are related. Being anti-gay is very much tied to the Bible, supposedly, anyway. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| democracy1st
|
Fri Dec-17-10 05:21 AM Response to Original message |
| 40. He needs to go rest,we can't even get a liberal elected! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:20 AM Response to Reply #40 |
| 58. Please see Reply 46. Hell, Im even optimistic the pendulum will swing in favor of liberals. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| old mark
|
Fri Dec-17-10 06:02 AM Response to Original message |
| 41. OK, so long as she is not a republican....nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Norrin Radd
|
Fri Dec-17-10 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
| 42. When will we have the first android President? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Stevenmarc
|
Fri Dec-17-10 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
| 45. You mean Lincoln doesn't count |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Fri Dec-17-10 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
| 46. A President's putting it out there is very important. Saying "no" would have been awful. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bluenorthwest
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 54. Jimmy is a smart man |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| madokie
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
| 57. Smart man |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dbt
|
Fri Dec-17-10 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
| 71. The entire South will have to be sedated |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RugbyGod
|
Fri Dec-17-10 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 72. I don't think so |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Feb 21st 2026, 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC