No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-12-13 01:32 AM
Original message |
| Why Obama rejected Simpson Bowles ( cuts to defense spending recommended by SB were too deep for |
rpannier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-12-13 02:27 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Why am I not surprised |
|
The man to the right of Nixon strikes again
|
No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-14-13 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Right of Nixon might not be so bad these days. Right of Reagan, however, |
|
is very troubling.
Then again, I like Democratic politicians who are actually Democrats in principles, as well is in name.
Too bad most of them exist only in history books anymore.
|
Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-12-13 07:39 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Simpson-Bowles didn't even vote for Simpson-Bowles. |
No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-20-13 04:34 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. Well, Simpson and Bowles still love it. But some members of the Commission voted against it. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Dec 20th 2025, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message |