|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 07:54 PM Original message |
"Must have worked in the previous 12 months," More companies excluding long term unemployed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
1. This is seriously fucked up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 07:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. yup. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shawn703
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 05:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
27. Instead of saying unemployed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laundry_queen
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 06:25 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. That's exactly what I was thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XanaDUer
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. Can anything be done about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. This will go away sooner or later as the job market gets tighter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. " as the job market gets tighter." Never gonna happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 06:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. We are living in the new reality of persistant, higher unemployment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 10:14 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. The benefits of higher productivity should be shared and not just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Curmudgeoness
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
5. It is surprising that they are so explicit. They have done this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibDemAlways
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. It ought to be illegal. It is clearly a form of discrimination - not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
7. There needs to be a law to stop this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lifelong Protester
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
8. man, the 'system' just keeps getting stacked higher and tighter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
9. Sorry, but surely that's a violation of the EEO act no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
10. recommend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. It is perfectly legal, and also completely stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
13. Fall off the hamster wheel - become homeless, uninsured and unemployable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raccoon
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
14. This sucks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
15. throwaway people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
16. By hiring those deadbeats who watch soaps all day and languished off of their UI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 11:44 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Come on. Stop with the false 99er don't count argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 10:18 PM Response to Reply #19 |
38. The UI benefits don't determine unemployment rates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 11:12 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. However new claims implies just that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MattBaggins
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
17. Perfect solution: Pass a law that allows them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
18. You'd think they'd be smart enough to hire the long-term unemployed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hunter
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. It's more about abusing the worker's they've got... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
21. They are killing the baby boomers/middle class right before our eyes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 06:12 PM Response to Reply #21 |
31. +1000. Next stop: Soylent Green |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dreamnightwind
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
22. This sucks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 05:49 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Do you have any idea of how many Boomers are displaced? And |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dreamnightwind
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 06:51 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. Seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 08:56 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. It is my contention that most of the long term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dreamnightwind
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:33 AM Response to Reply #35 |
42. I dunno, that doesn't look like what's going on here to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 04:28 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Several other people here on DU say the same thing I am saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 11:09 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. dreamnighwind, if I may offer a bit of personal advice to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dreamnightwind
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 03:21 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 07:04 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. I was assigned to temp for a non-profit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 11:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
23. What's the case against tax incentives too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 05:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. If the Democrats were truly trying to reduce unemployment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 06:20 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. There's so much discrimination going on and no one wants to protect us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobburgster
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
24. Wow! This is scary......WTF, how the hell do they justify this behavior? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
28. America. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
30. How could this situation get any worse for those of us in this category????????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Mon Jan-24-11 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
36. Those ads are in many cases a cover for age discrimination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-11 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
46. If you don't have a job we don't want you, where the hell is this messed up shit coming from. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC