kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 04:40 PM
Original message |
| Republicans are scared to death Obama will succeed in Libya. |
|
Because they are more concerned about the next election than anything else. Have you ever seen a bigger bunch of hypocrites? After George W Bush and the illegal Iraq invasion, they have finally seen the light.
But if Khadafy is overthrown and a new government is set up in Libya, that will be difficult for the Republicans to run against. That is what they are scared of. They don't give a big rat's ass who is invaded or killed so long as there is a Republican President doing it.
If Obama is successful in getting rid of Khadafy, right or wrong, it will probably mean re-election for another term. That scares the beJesus out of the Obama haters.
|
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 04:41 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Obama knows we need to get this done within a month else we're in trouble |
|
Either we have a Kosovo or another Iraq/Afghanistan
|
WhiteTara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 04:42 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. I'm scared he won't. n't |
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Yes, we are scared that he won't succeed... |
|
...and the Repubs are scared that he will succeed.
|
Zorra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. So war can be good politics. |
|
That's scary and horrible, and probably true.
|
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. He should have gotten The Big Boner to buy in on the military action. |
|
Now The Big Boner can claim he was against if things dont work out and visa versa. Not to mention that our Constitution requires Congress to declare war.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |
Tx4obama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 05:00 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. The majority of Libya's population is near the coast. This shouldn't take long. |
|
http://mappery.com/maps/Africa-Population-Map (dot) jpg Replace the (dot) above with a real dot to see the map, it's too big to insert into the comment area.
|
lunatica
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. Politics is all about strategery |
|
Fuck truth or facts. It's about what's the best for the party and what's the expedient thing to do. Right now Obama is not good for the GOP and really not good for the Teabag party.
|
Waiting For Everyman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 05:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Yup. I agree with you. |
former9thward
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 05:13 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. What is "success"? Obama has not given an end game to this. |
Thunderstruck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 05:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 11. I don't think they have anything to fear there. |
MNBrewer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 05:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 13. I sincerely hope that his plans do succeed |
|
whatever those are, if they include preventing the pro-democracy forces in Libya from being slaughtered.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 14. The Republican base doesn't care about Libya. |
|
If he loses or if he wins, he still loses. No, I don't think the Republicans are afraid.
|
DFW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |
| 15. Republicans are scared of Obama succeeding at ANYTHING |
|
Considering their miserable slate of potential candidates to stand against Obama, I'd hope that their fears are more than justified.
|
quaker bill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
Of course being a successful CIC steps on their toes just a bit harder.
|
fishwax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
Marie Marie
(709 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |
| 16. Republicans are a'scared of everything! Poor dears. |
bluestate10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |
| 17. They have even sent their like minds to swarm DU. nt |
Donnachaidh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message |
| 18. have they even decided on what constitutes *success*? |
|
Or is that the detail no one really wants to think about at the moment? :sarcasm:
|
FiveGoodMen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 19. We've been committed to yet another war |
|
which we'll have to pay for with more cuts to the poor and middle class.
That is the purpose of all current US wars.
It's already succeeded.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 20. Success is an ambiguous concept in war... |
|
It is defined after the fact.
If Khadafy is killed or forced to leave the country, that might be considered a "success" by some?
If some form of "democratic" government is created, that might be considered a success?
If it is over rather quickly, that might be considered a success?
If the people take over their country without American troops on the ground, that might be considered a success.
However, at the moment, no one wishes to stick their neck under the blade. They will interpret and define the "victory" after the "war" is "won".
|
provis99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 23. nope. there's no endgame. |
|
If Gadaffi were the target, that would be the endgame. But this vague, "bomb to protect civilians" directive has no point of reference to decide when success has been achieved.
|
StarburstClock
(583 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 06:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 21. Regime change is a direct violation of the UN charter, and it's spelled Gaddafi |
|
I know laws and treaties don't matter when a person's political alignment wants to ignore them, and insulting everyone by calling them "Obama haters" is just as ignorant.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 22. People spell it different ways. |
Initech
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 06:36 PM
Response to Original message |
| 24. I finally see an upside to Libya. |
Arkana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 06:38 PM
Response to Original message |
| 25. I don't want Obama to be responsible for getting "rid" of Gadhafi. |
|
That's the rebellion's problem.
We're just trying to keep them from getting killed.
|
bobbolink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
| 30. Exactly, nor is that what the Libyans want. They want to try him themselves. |
|
Its their revolution, and they want to fight it. They just want Gs bombing to stop.
|
Arkana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
| 31. If Iraq and Afghanistan have proven anything |
|
it is that we blow goats at nation-building. Really. We suck at it. If there was a Special Olympics for Nationbuilding, they wouldn't even give us an award just for trying.
|
bobbolink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
| 32. This is NOT about Iraq. |
|
The Libyans aren't asking us to build them a nation.
They don't WANT us to build them a nation.
They will REFUSE to let us build then a nation.
Can you jump the rails for one minute and understand that there is a DIFFERENCE here?
|
Arkana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
| 35. I do understand--I realize that the circumstances here are very different. |
|
1) We have cause--it's on our TV screens and on the Internet every day.
2) We have UN approval and a strong coalition that isn't us, Poland, and Costa Rica.
3) Most importantly, WE WERE INVITED. The rebels asked why the world wasn't helping them as Gadhafi dropped bombs on their heads. This would be us helping.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 06:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 06:44 PM
Response to Original message |
| 27. I'm curious how we define "success" . This is all too nebulous for me and I |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-22-11 06:45 PM by myrna minx
fear it's another quagmire in the making - with the benefactors being the IMF and the neo-cons and the expense of our troops and the Libyan people. :-(
|
meow mix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 10:24 PM
Response to Original message |
| 33. That scares the beJesus out of the Obama haters. |
ProgressIn2008
(848 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-22-11 10:27 PM
Response to Original message |
| 34. I don't give a shit what Republicans think or whether Obama "succeeds" |
|
whatever "success" means here. Or what new government getting "set up" in Libya will mean. That's just one more form of politics-as-football and I'm done with that. I'm rooting for the world to come out unscathed.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Feb 15th 2026, 04:44 PM
Response to Original message |