|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
| Vehl
|
Tue Mar-29-11 12:20 PM Original message |
| India says no(for special protocol Status) to US request on Sarah Palin |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| marmar
|
Tue Mar-29-11 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Perhaps India regards that particular strain of stupid as an infectious disease. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| opihimoimoi
|
Tue Mar-29-11 12:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. I guess they PLAUGUED HER.....like the BLK DEATH.....in a nice way |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| damntexdem
|
Tue Mar-29-11 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Hey, if she'd just stay in either India or Israel, I'd say give her all the statuses she wants. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Angry Dragon
|
Tue Mar-29-11 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. A very stupid request |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| shraby
|
Tue Mar-29-11 12:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. Probably Palin |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lumpy
|
Tue Mar-29-11 01:07 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 7. The American embassy in New Delhi requested it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alfredo
|
Tue Mar-29-11 01:21 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 9. The embassy worker might have been a fan of hers, or was |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Vehl
|
Tue Mar-29-11 01:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 12. yeah, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alfredo
|
Tue Mar-29-11 01:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 16. Many bushies are still on the job if they are Civil Service. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Vehl
|
Tue Mar-29-11 02:06 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 18. makes sense. tks. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alfredo
|
Tue Mar-29-11 07:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 22. Bush put people in posts to discredit the agencies. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| highplainsdem
|
Tue Mar-29-11 01:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 17. He isn't uninformed, but he's a moderate Democrat. He campaigned for Obama. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lumpy
|
Tue Mar-29-11 02:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 19. I am not convinced that Obama is informed or any one else running |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jwirr
|
Tue Mar-29-11 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Thank you India - she is not a representative in any legal way for |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bvar22
|
Tue Mar-29-11 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Why would Palin even be considered for "ministerial status"? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Vehl
|
Tue Mar-29-11 01:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 11. yep |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dappleganger
|
Tue Mar-29-11 01:35 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 13. What's with that? Don't they have a special quitter status just for her?? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tierra_y_Libertad
|
Tue Mar-29-11 01:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 15. The Church of St. Cariboopsie? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| northernlights
|
Tue Mar-29-11 07:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 23. first thing that occurred to me, too |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Octafish
|
Tue Mar-29-11 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. Now THERE's a Democracy! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tierra_y_Libertad
|
Tue Mar-29-11 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. India is on a strict diet. No garbage. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Duke Newcombe
|
Tue Mar-29-11 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. Poor, poor Sarah... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| malaise
|
Tue Mar-29-11 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. Very good |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Feb 16th 2026, 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC