Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lightning Captured by X-Ray Camera—A First

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:59 PM
Original message
Lightning Captured by X-Ray Camera—A First
Lightning Captured by X-Ray Camera—A First

The first x-ray images of a lightning strike have been captured by a, well, lightning-fast camera, scientists say. The pictures suggest a lightning bolt carries all its x-ray radiation in its tip. (Get lightning facts.)

During recent thunderstorms in Camp Blanding, Florida, the camera's electronic shutter "froze" a lightning bolt—artificially triggered by rockets and wires—as it sped toward the ground at one-sixth the speed of light.

"Something moving this fast would go from the Earth to the moon in less than ten seconds," said Joseph Dwyer, a lightning researcher at the Florida Institute of Technology in Melbourne.

Scientists have known for several years that lightning emits radiation, said Dwyer, who revealed the photos at an annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco earlier this month.

But until now scientists didn't have the technology to take x-ray images quickly enough to see where the radiation comes from, he said.



http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/12/101223-lightning-x-rays-camera-science-technology/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow... that's cool... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's not as cool as me, but it is pretty cool
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. I dunno. That picture's so cool
...you could store a side of beef in it for a month. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skepticscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Uh, does this guy even know what he's talking about?
"Scientists have known for several years that lightning emits radiation"? Hello...people have always known this. If it didn't emit radiation, you couldn't freaking see it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. pretty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm a bit confused.
Is that an artist's rendering or a composite? The article said that the camera was huge and:

"Because lightning moves blindingly fast, the camera was required to take ten million images per second."

Due to memory constraints, the camera took very low res pics (30 pixels) pictures but that picture is much, much higher quality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The camera would have to be set to
Edited on Tue Dec-28-10 02:35 AM by intheflow
"take ten million images per second" since lightening moves too fast for a human to capture it as it happens - hence the shot must be caught by chance. The greater the number of photos taken, the greater the chance of catching lightning in action.

They could have taken a 40' x 60' photo at 30 pixels but could raise the number of pixels when shrinking the overall image down to a size suitable for publication and online viewing. I do this all the time with my photos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm confused, too
The lead picture must not represent the actual XRay image. At 30 pixels, it would look like blobs of light.

If they showed the actual XRay image superimposed on the hi-res color picture, it would make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. please note the pic in the OP is NOT an x-ray image
it is merely a picture of a lightning strike in visible light. The x-rays were picked up by a detector rather than an actual 'camera' that only stored 30 pixels per 'image'.

not to say this isn't a very cool idea...but the pic is misleading.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Feb 14th 2026, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC