Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 05:50 PM
Original message |
| Remember if it wasn't for Ben Nelson siding with the Republicans to give them their fifty votes |
|
Which allowed Cheney to cast the tie breaking vote we wouldn't be having this tax cut debate...
|
villager
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Though the Democrats didn't actually filibuster, did they? |
Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. They couldn't because it was done through reconcilliation |
|
They LIED through their teeth and said it would lower the Deficit..
|
villager
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. Hmmm... and there's no legal remedy for lying to use reconciliation, I guess... |
|
Would've been nice if the episode gave the Dems some backbone, in its wake.
But I guess 9/11 and strategically delivered white powder saw to that...
|
xchrom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. Except in the imagination of SOME dem supporters |
|
That crew in the senate was never lied to.
|
Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. It isn't up to the Senate |
|
I believe it is Office of Budget and Management that decides what meets the criteria. It isn't up to the Senate.. Democrats could have used the exact same reasoning to pass their middle class tax cuts and let the rest expire but noooo, they said it had no effect on the deficit so could not be used...
|
xchrom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 8. I'll have to look that up - BUT as a reality I don't think dem senators |
|
Are sold a 'bill of goods' that they sell us out on in good faith.
Their aides feed them info from all kinds of sources all the time. And both the senators and their aides know from good info.
|
xchrom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 05:57 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. It's true - which only makes one wonder about this 'big tent' . Nt |
Autumn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Lot of big ass elephants shitting everywhere in the tent, |
|
maybe it's time to clean it out.:shrug:
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 10. Thats pretty much the way it is too |
|
and yes its time to clean house. In this case government, the house and senate. These tired old bastids are killing our democracy whether they know it or not, dead is dead, no coming back. Sorry SOB's anyway
|
Autumn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 12. Total agreement right here |
|
from one old okie to another. They are destroying the country and our party.
|
JamesA1102
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Didn't Mary Landrieu vote for that too? nt |
BzaDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message |
| 11. That's actually not true at all for the 2001 tax cuts. Those passed with 62 votes. You are talking |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 06:25 PM by BzaDem
about the 2003 tax cut package.
|
Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 13. Yes I am as those are the ones we are currently addressing. |
BzaDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 14. Actually, most of what we are addressing was in the 2001 tax bill (such as the top rates, etc). |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Feb 11th 2026, 01:12 AM
Response to Original message |