Reply #41: What other choice was there?

[aquart]

The attack was concentrated and relentless. I saw very little of Bev and a great deal of other egos, but the only ego discussed was Bev's.

As to whether anyone actually said the words "con man," please. That was the ENTIRE implication.

As for Olberman, I found HIS statements remarkably abrasive. But, again, that wasn't the topic of the discussions.

Good thing I'm not a moderator. I would have banned a whole different list. Starting thread after thread attacking one person on the same day would have been a no-no for me. But maybe I lack a sense of justice.