Reply #178: Come on

[KTM]

You need to go back and read what she is saying. After MONTHS of claiming freepers were attacking her and the GOP is stealing the election, she starts claiming George Bush in on her side.

Look, I dont have a dog in this fight.. although, like it or lump it, I think Bev played a huge role in helping this story gain some much needed traction - as did many others, including yourself, understood. But I think it is plain you are going overboard with this one silly "dont pick on freepers" post of hers, and in doing so (at least for me) weaken your own arguments as much as you claim she weakens hers.

She never claims "George Bush is on her side," from what I see.. just that he bought her book, as did many others on the Right. (That would be a bad assumption on your part, BTW.. the one I originally referenced is the one that says "she says some freepers arent all that bad, therefore she must be on their side."

Again, I'm not a fan on the knuckle-dragging, hate-spewing, close-minded stereotypical "moran" whom we call a Freeper... but it would be idiotic of me to assume that none who are members there are more moderate than that stereotype. We know we at DU have some far lefties, some moderates, heck, some DINOs even.. I've no doubt some of my more computer-literate moderate Pub coworkers go there (and likewise no doubt that some of my more idiotic ditto-head coworkers go there as well.) Your inference that she is embracing all of freeper-dom simply because she argues that we shouldnt alienate everyone on the right is poor, and I suspect you - as someone who has made intelligient posts and sound arguments in the past - know that.