You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: Fury doesn't describe it any more. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Fury doesn't describe it any more.
The stage for the mix-ups was set by a state law that requires candidates' names be rotated on ballots so that each candidate gets a turn at the top position. The rotation is done in the name of fair play, a nod to conventional wisdom that undecided voters tend to choose the name at the top.

In Cuyahoga County, where punch-card voting machines are used, the names are rotated on the pages in voting books that guide voters to the proper position on the punch cards. There were five versions of the page for the presidential candidates.

------snip

Voters from multiple precincts typically share a polling place. Candidates' names in voting books are rotated by precinct, so there are different versions at the same polling place.

-----snip

The problem comes when a punch-card ballot for one precinct is inserted in the voting device for another precinct. Because of the name rotation, a voter unknowingly punches a hole for the wrong candidate.

-----snip

But there are clear signs that, in some cases, poll workers erred in setting up the polling stations or misdirected voters. And voters, who often stood in long lines in cramped quarters, may have grabbed any open booth they could find, unaware there was a difference. In some cases, a combination of both factors conspired to produce bad votes.

-----snip

"There was no distinction between precincts," Daley said. "Voters were being told to go to any machine that was open."

------snip

Gant was a Democratic observer who saw poll workers respond to long lines, crowded space and a broken machine by sending voters from one precinct to machines for another.

------snip


http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1102674912293811.xml (requires free registration)


There is only one solution to this colossal mess, and that is a REVOTE nationwide, using pen and paper ballots, hand counted at each precinct immediately after the poll closes and under observation by representatives of the public, and the results immediately phoned in to the Supervisor of Elections' Office.

Computers must be banned from every step of this process.

We must accept nothing less at this juncture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC