You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: Which would mean... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
teach1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Which would mean...
Sorenson said that when the initial phase of the war ended May 1, 2003, after the Saddam Hussein regime had been ousted from Baghdad, the U.S. military had no idea it would face an extensive IED threat.


Which would mean that the neocons who ignored warnings and declared that we would be met with as a liberating Army with flowers and all of that are directly responsible for this crap.

But we knew that. They had to have known about IEDs (bombs). They were convinced by some madmen that nobody would use the bombs against us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC