You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: What profits? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
bunyip Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. What profits?
Businesspeople in any industry are paranoid about a supplier establishing a monopoly and screwing them. As an example, Ford will not purchase more than 20% of any part from the one supplier. Monsanto invested big in this technology, as part of a hair-brained scheme to monopolize the world's supply of grain. They bought up all their big competitors and tried to sell their modified, terminator-locked seeds to Western agribusiness giants. No one fell for this obvious scam. Monsanto's remaining small competitors grew into large competitors. Greenpeace and other fringe groups started yammering. Monsanto failed. Their competitors laughed at them. Their share price sagged. $7,000,000,000 later, they got out of the game and focused on other things they can make.

Illiterate, suspicious, deeply conservative Third World farmers are even less likely to abandon control of their seed stock than wealthy Westerners. The new players are trying to give it away, and still no one wants Terminator seeds.

They are free to sell them, and we are free not to buy. The UK is backpedalling on their populist blanket ban in favor of testing and regulation. Let them.

GM crops have been in use for 10,000 years. The modification process is totally unregulated in most countries, and relies on cosmic rays and other mutagens randomly attacking plant DNA, which is then artificially selected by farmers. This is where traditional varieties come from. Biologists found they can speed the process up by irradiating seeds to cause more mutations, and then DNA technology allowed controlled changes with predicable results to be made. This has led to simple, plant-based manufacture of vaccines and to more nutritious crops. These crops are state-regulated and extensively tested, unlike the genetically-modified but unregulated traditional varieties. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_engineering


"Terminator Technology" is to Greenpeace et al what the "War on Terror" is to Bush. It attracts attention, keeps the masses scared, and facilitates spending their money to promote a regressive Return To Year Zero agenda they would otherwise run from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC