You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #57: Umm, Yes. Bush still would have won, even if S.CT had not interfered. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
indeman Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. Umm, Yes. Bush still would have won, even if S.CT had not interfered.
This is not a republican talking point. Even mediamatters.org (a solid, reputable liberal website) recognizes the media consortium study indicating that Gore still probably would have lost under the limited recount that he sought. In order for Gore to have won, he would had to have "found a way to trigger a statewide recount of all disputed ballots." http://mediamatters.org/items/200502220004. But Gore did not ask for a statewide recount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC