You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: Generalisations [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
paraguay Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Generalisations
You have made a huge assumption from journalism and leftist spin.A few bankers make bets and signs and they get generalised to 'scum', this is generalisation from the particular. If we take this literally the protestors assaulted police officers and caused damage to banks so therefore they are criminals so on your logic all of the protestors are 'criminals'.

As for 8% this is a short sited estimate as you have forgotten that the majority of their salaries are spent in the UK and therefore a more conservative estimation they contribute 16- 25% as an industry due to the amount of industries that rely upon them a simple example being cleaners.Money going abroad is a thing of the yester year and you are ignoring taxation reforms of 1998,2001 and 2004 which were all under a centre left labour government so you should be satisfied.

A state owned banking system would never have made the same contribution to wealth, soveriegn wealth funds maybe but we are not allowed those due to the Blairite years, a common theme another centre left politician. State owned anything has gone wrong Gordon Brown spent away the profits of old, put it this way I am glad I did not have to bank with him. Further more state owned banks for the long term are inherently against democracy which we are living in (although you may argue it is a sham).

As for the concept of being able to rob the economy this is a ludricous standpoint for an argument formulated upon leftist ideas. Economic Determinist you should be and therfore the economy always is right and unfoolable. These banks are part of the 'economy' do not portray them as a separate entity which they are not!

As for the man who died he died of natrual cause (rest his soul)although it must be conceded that betting was wrong but again this is generalisation from the particular.

As for gambit on bankers being attacked this I do not mean literally I mean as in the sense that their way of life and livelyhoods are being attacked and their moral status degraded by people targetting their aggression at a social phenomenon'greed' which is a result of every member of the UK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC