Reply #5: If you think about it...

[CoffeeCat]

...all we've heard is LIES--horrendous, dangerous lies--regarding Fukushima.

We recently discovered that at least three reactors had completely meltdown fairly early
in this saga. So, we know they were lying when they said they had no meltdown, and
constantly downplayed the potential dangers of Fukushima with their favorite line, "At
least it's not as bad as Chernobyl!".

Bullroar. Fukushima has TEN TIMES more nuclear material than Chernobyl EVER did. The
potential for catastrophe is worse than Chernobyl, and they knew at least three reactors
had melted down--and they covered it up.

They've recently revealed that these meltdowns happened. Now, they're saying that they're
having problems with the remaining reactors. I'm wondering if they're scrambling desperately
to come up with excuses or reasons for attaching MORE bad news or more meltdowns.

If they can say, "Ohhhh noes, this new rainstorm broke two reactors!"

I just don't trust anything they say. They're proven liars. They told Japanese
women to feed their radioactive breast milk to infants. They've allowed children to
attend schools where radioactive isotope levels are life threatening. And forget about
any warnings for us! Our media has handily followed their marching orders for a media
blackout on this story.

It's disgusting and beyond the pale.