Reply #26: I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree...

[Mithras61]

We're wasting each others time here. I don't accept your arguments and you won't accept mine. You place far to much belief in the "multitude of prgrammers" theory. The fact is that the coding required would be pretty small, and that the systems are created in a proprietary environment where no one is allowed to see the final code except for a select few (who are selected based on standards which we aren't allowed to see).

And yes, I do know something of computer security and procedures... I design security for networks as part of my job as a network consultant, so I can assure you that ANY system that can be physically attained can be breached, and very quickly to boot, and any breached system can be manipulated in almost any way the breacher chooses (especially since this is an old version of Windows CE that the machines are using!).