Reply #123: You really are fanatic

[aneerkoinos]

I start with a "you..." sentence, paying in kind your attempts "your symposium...", "your conclusion...", neither of which have nothing to do with me or what I have posted.

Once again, you try to frame it as if there would be only two possible positions.

The basic flaw in the assumption you make about science is when you equal 'materialistic methodology', which is the current paradigm in natural science, with whole 'scientific methodology'. Sad part is that you have become so emotionally attached to that basic flaw, that you call science "degraded" when not everyone in the field agrees to share your position and/or are not punished for doing so. How is that different from fundamentalism?