Reply #17: Therefore, they are under no obligation to comply with NC State Law?

[W stands for Wacko]

What was his argument: Guilty as charged, Your Honor?

Why was it left to an activist to challenge the action of NC State officials?

Is there a provision in the NC state Constitution that obliges officers of that state to act when they become aware of unlawful acts being committed by anyone in that state, ESPECIALLY another NC State official?


Does this fit into the broader argument for a case of Equity to be presented to the SCOTUS seeking relief from enforcement of the HAVA act?

... on the basis that states are demonstrating that they are turning a blind eye to their own laws and trampling the rights of the voters in stalling for years on enacting HAVA requirements only then to rush to implement installation of e-voting machines while trampling the laws of those states in regard to the process for enacting such changes.

... on the basis that these e-voting machines are demonstrated to be insecure, leave citizens votes unprotected, and have been demonstrated to utilize software that is neither federally sanctioned, tested, known, or documented, but that is demonstrated by scientists to be buggy and unreliable.

... on the basis that in direct defiance of state court orders, these state officials have usurped the power of the states in order to haphazardly comply with a federal act.