You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Jack Straw, in this context, IS the government interfering. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Jack Straw, in this context, IS the government interfering.
He is the government, and he brought the subject up.

I can't see that anyone in this argument, so far, has resorted to evidence. I'm not even sure what such evidence would look like. Statistical studies on the effects of various sorts of public religious dress, anecdotal testimonials, maybe.

The Archbishop is not asserting that anyone wants to take away all religious symbols, the Archbishop is arguing that the government should have nothing to say about the subject, that it is none of the governments business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC