You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #103: not in the constitution [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
rtracey Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #71
103. not in the constitution
The Constitution does not contemplate the filibuster in any way, directly or indirectly. The filibuster is a delaying tactic that is a part of the rules of the Senate. The Constitution allows each house of Congress to set its own rules. Early on, both houses had unlimited debate provisions. The term for the use of unlimited debate as a legislative tactic became known as a filibuster in the 1850's, but it was never set up in the Constitution as a specific aspect of the congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC